Quote:
Originally posted by cpawfan!
I take the other side and say why is that so much that it made a difference to the Nets???
Ratner and Thorn both said resigning Kenyon was the top offseason priority.
Looking forward to the spin yet to come from Ratner.
|
It's different because the Nets have other things to worry about. RJ next year, them having to pay a major luxury tax. This was Kenyon's move to make. If he wanted to stay in NJ so bad, he could have went straight to them and said, "I'm willing to sacrifice some money if I can get a 7 year deal on this team."
The other side can obviously be taken though. If we are going to sign him 7 years for $90 million, why not just keep him?