|
i think people take for granted the ability to perform at the highest level when it matters most. or the ability to integrate themselves into a winning situation, to shine individually while in the context of a championship team. some players, with equal ability, can do it better than others. those who prove this ability, imo, have to be regarded slightly above, imo (all else relatively equal, of course). i'm less concerned with what you do when you have little. show me what you can do when you've got enough. if we want to rate players solely on ability, fine, take winning out of the equation. but there's more to being a great player than just ability.
|