Quote:
Originally posted by <b>Yyzlin</b>!
And I'm not sure why getting points on put-backs is a negative either.
|
Getting points on put-backs is not the negative. The negative is that Boozer has generally been poor at creating his own shot. It's not a negative to get points against "broken defense"...it
is a negative to be poor against set defense.
Quote:
|
Randolph grabs just as many offensive boards as Boozer. What is it saying when Boozer is better at cashing those in for points? It seems to me that getting points off put backs is a huge positive, creating points off other teammates miscues.
|
Actually, I didn't say Boozer is better at cashing in offensive rebounds for points. Randolph is tremendous at that too. What I was saying is that those (and fastbreak points, wide-open lay-ups created by teammates) comprise almost all of Boozer's offense. Randolph has that
and a better ability to score against set defense.