Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kamego
So your comparing Harrington to Corliss? And Corliss has been the perfect example of a 4 in a 3s body his whole career....
|
Harrington is better than Corliss, and I don't even think it's close. Harrington can probaly score better (Corliss's strength) and their defensive abilities aren't even close.
Besides Artest, Harrington was our toughest cover when we played Indiana, the guy is a matchup disaster for the other team. You will not be able to cover him with a three, and a four is more than likely to small. He's a better version of Corliss (the player we missed the most) and I really don't see why we'd pass this deal up.
Since Joe D. knows S.A. is offering just Rasho maybe he is holding out for more, but if we can get Harrington, I'd be fine with that.