Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TucsonClip
It doesnt have the meaning it did in the 80's and 90's, but you cant be mad at the voters for giving it to Nash again. 18.8 and 10.5 is amazing considering he didnt have his best player and was playing with 10 new players. He still led his team team to the 4th best record in the NBA and another divison title.
|
Yawn: his numbers pale in comparison to the other players. The freakin team he left has done better w/o him. How valuable is Dirk if Dallas has done better w/o Nash?
If he's so valuable how come the other top candidates have better +/- numbers. The other candidates also play WAY MORE minutes then Nash.
Nash winning consecutive MVP's is a joke