Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Vaught from his Spot
First of all, I think money should be no object when it comes to paying for a coach. After years of ineptitude from Donald Sterling, he owes us AT LEAST that much.
Second, Mike Dunleavy has a horrid tendency to overcoach, so to speak. He makes substitutions that make sense only in his mind and is far too matchup driven. And he really doesn't have a damn clue when it comes to beating the Phoenix Suns.
With that said, I think that Mike Dunleavy is the perfect guy for this team at this time. He commands the respect of the players, young and old alike, and gets them to buy into his system. He's very good at getting the best out of his team, even though he steps in their way at times. It even seems that he's finally forced discipline into the head of Corey Maggette, a perinially unfocused, dumb player. Corey's been committed to defense and has cut down on the bad shots, and he's on board with doing whatever it takes to win. I agree with a lot of the gripes that many Clipper fans have with him, but you can't deny he's been a positive force on our team, and moreover the organization. I'd like to see him stay a while.
|
Most of us agree that he has done a good thing by getting this team out of the gutter, but the problem most people also have is that he's not the coach to get us the mountain top. That much of the offensive schemes has been done by Sam Cassell. During the playoffs, we probably match up against coachs like... Phil Jackson, Greg Popovich, Mike D'Antoni, Jeff Van Gundy, Don Nelson, Avery Johnson, Pat Riley... How many people honestly think Dunleavy can out-coach these guys in a 7-game series? Offensively, the clippers talent is very under utilized, and it will show against well coached teams.