Quote:
Originally posted by <b>q</b>!
I would much rather have Mark Madsen's career. It's all about the championships my friend. Please let me know the reasons other than the rings that he is better than. The only one I can remember is that he is a low-post player, that's not a reason why someone is better though, so I would like to hear your reasons.
|
Awards, accolades, titles, dominance, size(which does make a difference), stats, are all reason why Duncan is better than KG.
In one sentence, Tim Duncan has done more with his career in less time than KG and that is why he's a better player.
Why do you think KG is better?
If KG keeps the same pace without ever winning a title he will still be in the hall of fame. Mark Madsen could win another 5 rings the same way he has and not be a hall of famer. His career has not been more successful than KG's at all.