Silk D

this thread can go on forever. It boils down to what you think we need more; experience or athleticism/penetration, with defense being pretty equally bad.

I'm not buying that Fish will stunt the growth of our young guys. He won't play more than 25-30 minutes a game, and he can do nothing but help them in practice and in the locker room. If they take the job from him, so be it; who cares? But I'd rather have them take the job from an experienced vet versus letting them learn on the fly and possibly costing us a couple games. They'll be fine, and Fish will help with their development.

N jazzy, com'on man. you one of my favorite posters, but you seriously think our team would be better off w/o Luke and Fish so long as we added some athletes? what do you want? another mo evans that can jump out the gym, put some points on the board, but can't make smart basketball plays to save his life? The dip in the teams chemistry was painfully obvious when luke went to the bench and mo replaced him. Not everything that Luke and Fish will do to help us win games is going to show up on the stat sheet, and no, they're not great (or even good) defenders. But they're smart players, they make the most of what they have, and they'll help us win games, period.