View Single Post

Old 07-21-2007, 07:56 PM   #14 (permalink)
NetIncome
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
 
NetIncome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Jungleland
Posts: 13,166
Credits: 36,188.16
Rep Power: 5646630 NetIncome has a reputation beyond repute NetIncome has a reputation beyond repute NetIncome has a reputation beyond repute NetIncome has a reputation beyond repute NetIncome has a reputation beyond repute NetIncome has a reputation beyond repute NetIncome has a reputation beyond repute NetIncome has a reputation beyond repute NetIncome has a reputation beyond repute NetIncome has a reputation beyond repute NetIncome has a reputation beyond repute
Re: The real reason that we don't stay Mikki Moore

Quote:
Originally Posted by njnets21
I know one of the parties involved and I can tell you with 100% certainty that this is exactly what did happen. I tried to say that in another thread, but NI is right on and this is completely accurate.
Thorn wanted toughness and Magloire brings it. Moore does not. Re-signing Moore meant signing a terrific backup for Krstic. Signing Magloire, at a very cheap price, meant signing a starting center.

The key difference is not the $8 million difference between what the Nets offered Moore and what the Kings offered him; it's the $6.3 million difference between what the Nets offered Moore and what they agreed to pay Magloire. It's a risk, but also a no-brainer if they think Magloire can bring them double double numbers...which is what he has done the last two years when playing 30 or more minutes.
__________________
NetsDaily...now available in Chinese
NetIncome is offline   Reply With Quote