View Single Post

Old 12-24-2007, 07:48 AM   #14 (permalink)
luther
Star
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,967
Credits: 12,773.94
Rep Power: 2512509 luther has a reputation beyond repute luther has a reputation beyond repute luther has a reputation beyond repute luther has a reputation beyond repute luther has a reputation beyond repute luther has a reputation beyond repute luther has a reputation beyond repute luther has a reputation beyond repute luther has a reputation beyond repute luther has a reputation beyond repute luther has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Best player potential wise?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mateo View Post
In terms of potential I don't think Foye or McCants are starter quality. if Brewer becomes Prince (which might or might not happen), then that's 1 star and 1 slightly above average player. That's not good enough to be a playoff team, let alone a contender. I mean, look at the recent KG teams. KG (star), Ricky Davis (slightly above average starter) and a bunch of so-so players and we weren't that good. What we're talking about right now is a poor man's version of those teams.

I just think that this team is going to look a lot different if/when we become relevant again.
I agree that there is still talent to be added. I do think Foye and McCants hover around starter quality, though. The problem is, I think they're both better suited to a sixth man role, Foye because I think he's a matchup problem (not to our advantage) against good PG and good SGs (but likely more than fine against second teamers), and McCants mostly just because I don't trust him--I'd rather ride him when he's hot and ignore him otherwise. But I do think he could average 14-15 ppg eventually in that role.

Anyway, you can't have two sixth men. I don't think. I'm no mathematician.

I'm hopeful that Theo's contract becomes a good player (via trade, as I don't trust our ability to lure free agents), and that our pick ends up a good one. That's theoretically two more pieces.
luther is offline   Reply With Quote