|
Re: is there a reason why van horn is not the solution.
The original deal had the Nets getting George which would take him off Dallas $. By signing KVH and trading him to the Nets they are ADDING his $ to their payroll so instead of subtracting George's $ they are in essence adding KVH salary and then trading it so they still owe George's contract and thus have to pay additional tax. So they end up owing George's contract since he is still on team as well as whatever tax is on KVH deal since they are over the tax already instead of simply subtracting George's since he would have been traded.
To tme...the larger problem (and more than likely the dealbreaker)will turn out to be the Stackhouse situation.
|