03-12-2008, 11:20 PM
|
#40 (permalink)
|
|
All-Star Lock
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 16,886
|
Re: Oh no: Clippers sign Smush
Quote:
Originally Posted by yamaneko
The sad thing is, i dont like this deal, because it makes us a BETTER team than we are now. Smush might actually mean another victory or two. For this offense, smush is actually better than knight and dickau combined, which is why dunleavvy went after him before going after either knight or dickau in the offseason. Hes not undersized, he plays good perimeter defense, hes an offensive minded PG, etc.
Had knight not had a two year deal, i wouldnt be shocked to see him (with a star PG in the draft or not) make this team next year as a primary backup. As it stands, i dont see us having a PG in the draft, plus picking up livvy's option, plus having knight come back since hes under contract, AND resigning smush.
Im really not sure why everyone is complaining here...you guys are complaining for the wrong reason. Had we been a near playoff team, and we made this move, it makes all the sense in the world. However, as a team who needs losses, we should be complaining because this move makes us BETTER, and at a waste of money (the money we saved by letting cassell go). THATS why this move sucks. We need to lose, not improve ourselves.
|
I still can't see Livingston back next year. The qualifying offer is $5.8 Million for a guy coming off a horrific injury who never proved anything even before that. That's a hell of a lot of money for probably little to nothing in return.
|
|
|