Quote:
Originally Posted by Najee
Considering that I was a newspaper journalist who covered the NBA, son, I would say my knowledge on the sport is much greater than yours.
|
I know you would say that. In fact, I think everyone who's read any post you've made so far can see that
you would say your knowledge on the sport is greater then mine. That's just one more thing you're wrong about.
Quote:
|
I certainly see the use for statistics, but unlike you, I am not so obtuse in my fixations with numbers-crunching (not to mention you evidently didn't see a good portion of the players named over a meaningful part of their careers, given your age) that I cannot make sense of them.
|
If you had actually read my post, you would know that this sentence is completely irrelevant.
Quote:
|
You certainly don't use any other subjective or objective form of evaluation other than some obsure mathematical computation derived from some statistician (or pseudostatistician)-turned-frustrated sports "authority."
|
Once again, please try
reading what I write before making comments on it.
Quote:
|
But I don't know anyone who has followed, covered or was a fan of the NBA over the past 20-plus years who would take some scrub like Freeman Williams over Michael Cooper.
|
Wow, what a shock. Here's another example of you completely ignoring my last post. It wouldn't really bother me if I thought you were just choosing to ignore my words and attacking a straw man you set up instead, but I really fear that the problem might go deeper. You might need to sign up for some reading comprehension classes at the local community college, gramps.
Now if you'd like to continue this conversation by responding to points I've actually made instead putting words in my mouth, I'd like to continue it as well. If not, just ignore these threads from now on. I promise it won't hurt anyone's feelings.