View Single Post

Old 04-24-2008, 02:05 PM   #17 (permalink)
leidout
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: So-Cal
Age: 26
Posts: 1,910
Credits: 908.26
Rep Power: 2772955 leidout has a reputation beyond repute leidout has a reputation beyond repute leidout has a reputation beyond repute leidout has a reputation beyond repute leidout has a reputation beyond repute leidout has a reputation beyond repute leidout has a reputation beyond repute leidout has a reputation beyond repute leidout has a reputation beyond repute leidout has a reputation beyond repute leidout has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Michael Redd's place among active pure SG's

Quote:
Originally Posted by Basel57 View Post
To the thread starter, give credit to yamaneko as he posted this exact same thread last night in the Clippers forum. I don't know why you're copying and pasting this as if it's your own thoughts on the situation.

I edited your post so people know who's actually making the argument. I know you mentioned in the Clippers forum that you're going to post it here, but not many people would have known that, so I'm just trying to give credit where it's due.
Thanks, i'm copying and pasting because in the clippers forum we're having a discussion about a particular mod (yamaneko) abusing his mod-powers by deleting posts which poke fun at his ideas, which he vehemently argues with very long posts. (this one i cut & pasted is one of the shorter ones)

In particular, we've been arguing how he places special criteria on certain players (Michael Redd in this case) to qualify them as "Superstars", yet his special criteria is obviously not accepted by the larger population of posters here. So we dubbed these players he endlessly argues for as "Yamastars", this word, which is somehow against the rules (wtf?) against the rules, has resulted in many of our posts being deleted.

Thanks to everyone who posted for the input in proving this guy wrong.
leidout is online now   Reply With Quote