Originally Posted by LameR

I don't have a very high opinion of Redd. I'd rank Kobe, Wade, Allen, Manu, and Johnson over him.

Also, Roy's 19/5/6 now, so I find it a little funny that you say maybe he could become 20/5/5 next year. His scoring may actually end up going down with Oden and Rudy coming, with more assists resulting. [/hijack]

Originally Posted by HKF

At his salary for what he brings to a team, he is one of the least impactful players in the NBA. He doesn't rebound, he doesn't assist, he simply is a volume shooter. He's basically Rashard Lewis. I know people will say, "but you're a Ben Gordon fan." To wit I will reply, it's different when Ben is scoring those points on a rookie salary deal, not a 93 million dollar contract.

Originally Posted by GrandKenyon6

Redd is a tremendously over-rated player.

Originally Posted by Pioneer10

No one in there right mind would take Redd over Manu (and I'm hoping the Cavs get Redd). Giniboli's a more efficient scorer (because he's get to the line), is a better defender, better passer, and better rebounder then Redd.

Originally Posted by croco

He is a poor man's version of Carmelo Anthony and that is not a good thing.

Originally Posted by rawse

I don't really care where he ranks among "pure" SGs (6-5 to 6-7 guys who don't play any other position). It's irrelevant. I'll take Monta Ellis and stick him in there at SG because he gets the job done.

That's really the only list that matters.

Originally Posted by Ruff Draft

He is just a shooter. Plain and simple. I'd take everyone on that list over him easily.

Originally Posted by bootstrenf

Kobe Bryant
Dwayne Wade
Ray Allen
Manu Ginobili
Kevin Martin
Ben Gordon
Joe Johnson
Monta Ellis
Brandon Roy
Vince Carter
Richard Hamilton
Tracy McGrady
Allen Iverson
Kevin Durant


only people that aren't better than redd are: ben gordon, vince carter, and kevin durant....durant only because he is a rookie with such a low shooting percentage.....


and i happent to think manu is at least a top 5 sg in the league...he has such an impact in winning and losing....mostly winning though....

Originally Posted by billfindlay10

Redd is good, but does not seem to be a game changer....

Originally Posted by KennethTo

1)Kobe
2)Wade
3)Roy
4)AI
5)Gino
6)McGrady
7)Joe Johnson
8)Ray Allen
9)Michael Redd
10)Monta Ellis

Originally Posted by Nutritionals

In the right situation, Redd can be a great asset to a team(a la Ray Allen) but he's obviously not someone to build a team around(a la Kobe or Wade)

Originally Posted by seifer0406

Redd is not someone that you build your offense around, and that's why the Bucks have been struggling. He should be used like how the Hornets use Peja or how the Celtics are using Ray Allen, as a pure shooter that relies on someone else to create shots for him. If he's used correctly, he isn't any worse than any other pure shooter in the league but doesn't offer as much to the table as guys that can slash and create shots for others.

Originally Posted by Hibachi

He's a shooter, and he's not a superstar. He's a really good second-hand man, which is why the Bucks sucked so much this year. Still not as bad as that eyesore that is Bobby Simmon's contract, but it is pretty bad.

Originally Posted by B-Roy

How much defense does Redd play? Close to none.