Quote:
Originally Posted by yamaneko
a guy (martin) who has had about 1.5 good years so far on an even worse team than the bucks, where even scrubs like garcia and salmons look good when there are injuries, over redd?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by yamaneko
Thats what i mean. The injuries. Without the injuries i think they are a pretty decent team. But artest missed 30 games. You had john salmons starting 41 games, paco garcia starting 20, a spurs released player started 51 games, bibby as we know missed a bunch even before he was traded, you had a clippers released player (mikki) starting a team high 79 games, that team was a mess. As is, i believe they still did well for what they through out there, which i attribute to coaching, which shocks as i thought theus had no business coaching in this league.
|
This doesn't make any sense. Kevin Martin this season has averaged more points, was more efficient from the field, 3pt line, ft line (as well as more aggressive getting to the line for 3 more fta's a game), more rebs, more stls, less to's than Redd (basically every single main category except assists). Leading a team that's had more injury woes, is in the tough western conference, yet has won 12 more games than the Redd-led Bucks have in the weak east.
What's the basis of saying first that kings are a worse team than bucks, and second that redd is a better player than martin?
If you were genuinely interested in hearing other people's opinons on this there's no reason why you wouldn't want to discuss your point of view and defend it in the main forum when it was raised. Leidout isn't the one coming across as insecure about their opinion
