How doesnt that make any sense? When a team has more issues, more injuries, less options, id expect someone to do better than someone in a similar, yet less dire situation. Like Kaman and Maggette this year. All of us here expected them to have statistically better years due to their weak supporting cast.
What is the basis of saying the kings are a worse team than the bucks this year? My basis is the players they had starting on paper, as mentioned before. Similar to perhaps saying, the clippers were a worse team than the 76ers this year. Maggette might have had better stats than iguoadala, but i dont think that would make him the supierior player.
Quote:
|
If you were genuinely interested in hearing other people's opinons on this there's no reason why you wouldn't want to discuss your point of view and defend it in the main forum when it was raised. Leidout isn't the one coming across as insecure about their opinion
|
How so? Is he a regular poster on the general forum? I certainly am not, and cannot remember the last time, if ever, i have psoted on there. I have always posted strictly on this clipper board, so why would i all of a sudden break character, and start going to other boards to post something? But no, the guy who goes and copies someones post and reposts it in other places is the one who is secure....