View Single Post

Old 04-30-2008, 11:01 PM   #8 (permalink)
compsciguy78
Small with Big Stick
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,032
Credits: 18,137.24
Rep Power: 894765 compsciguy78 has a reputation beyond repute compsciguy78 has a reputation beyond repute compsciguy78 has a reputation beyond repute compsciguy78 has a reputation beyond repute compsciguy78 has a reputation beyond repute compsciguy78 has a reputation beyond repute compsciguy78 has a reputation beyond repute compsciguy78 has a reputation beyond repute compsciguy78 has a reputation beyond repute compsciguy78 has a reputation beyond repute compsciguy78 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Tony Parker vs. Steve Nash

You know, I think people overestimate the ability to win games in the regular season.

Have you noticed most offensive based teams in the NBA, especially superior offensive, can amount many wins during the regular season with little attention to defense.

Examples...Dallas with Nash and Dirk
Phoenix
Golden State
Denver

All of these teams were offensive juggernauts...stats are gaudy and wins come along with the territory because of good point guards who control the up tempo offenses...

Its a recipe for regular season success...

If you are saying Nash is better because of that recipe then maybe Tony Parker should be given a chance to run one of those type of teams.

I think Nash's stats have been helped tremendously by never having to worry about his own defense and playing in those type of offenses. Tony Parker has been in the opposite situation so his stats look worse.

Pound for Pound, Tony Parker is the better PG.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by R-Star View Post
Chris Paul this year is not better than any year of J Kidd. Thats just a stupid, ignorant thing to say. I should get Jason Kidd to punch your wife in the face.
compsciguy78 is offline   Reply With Quote