Quote:
|
nice try, but wrong again....how is it "out of context"??? you specifically listed 4 traits that were factors in making redd a star...
|
Same to you. Out of context, because you are bringing in someone like kapono into the equation, when you know good and well, that were talking about star quality here, which kapono does not have. Its one thing to be able to shoot, but were talking to be able to shoot, and then apply it to superstar status. Not be a good shooter and score 7 points a game.
Quote:
|
and you counter that redd scores more...well, like Bon]{eRz said, kevin martin does everything better than redd, in a tougher conference, but you somehow claim redd is better...
|
Martin is not a better pure shooter than redd at this point. And i cant believe people are giving martin so much credit this early when hes had 1.5 good years only. He could turn into a great player, but he has not been mentioned at all as being a star that i have seen, at least in comparison to some of the others, including redd that we have mentioned.
Quote:
|
then you constantly talk about "game winning shots".....well, game winning shots don't really matter when you lead your team to the third worst record in the weak eastern conference....
|
LOL. game winning shots matter no matter what. It means you have that ability. Its not redds fault that the bucks have built a terrible team. You are either a clutch performer or youre not. Hes proven himself to be able to take the game winning shot, and on occasion make it.
Quote:
|
and finally, you claim redd is a star/franchise player because he is the best player in the bucks organization....well, chris kaman was undoubtedly the best player in the clippers organization.....does that make him a franchise player???? not so much.....
|
Hes a franchise player because hes the franchise player, plain and simple. the bucks have called him that, they have given him a contract because he fits that role, so he is the franchise player. Kaman is not the best player in the clippers organization, what are you talking about? Brand is our franchise player, he is our best player, he is paid as such as well.
Quote:
|
point by point, you have been proven wrong by numerous people, but you never concede....
|
Out of the 1000 points here, i have not been proven wrong even once. People have posted their own opinions, but there is nothing that proves anything i have said as wrong.
Quote:
|
not to mention that kapono completed a catch and shoot under .3 seconds.....
|
So derek fisher must have the quickest release in the game and thus be the best pure shooter? No. Thats a bogus argument there. you or i could catch and toss a ball up there in .4 seconds if we had to. Technically point two seconds if we just volley ball tap it. What the article was talking about, what i have been talking about, what analyssts has been talking about for years, is that redd and allen have the most pure shots, quickest releases, etc. in the game, and that brings them to a superstar level because they translate those skills to the tune of 25 points a game.
Quote:
|
you were so completely wrong, it was hilarious....but you glossed over that by claiming any gym rat could do the same and that it has nothing to do with being a star....but you were the one who brought up shooting ability as a factor in the first place!!!!
|
Once again grasping at straws here, taking things out of context, trying to twist my words, because you must be getting desperate to try to prove your unprovable point.
Quote:
|
you try to backtrack, and circumvent all the stupiid claims you have made, but it's impossiible because you have made so many.....
|
I havent back tracked at all. I have to go back and explain myself it seems to people like you who keep twisting my words, but thats certainly not backtracking. Not one of my points has been "proven" wrong, because nothing im saying has not been said before by people way smarter than you and I, nor is it based off of faulty information. Its not like im saying spud webb is the greatest player of the 80's. Im maintaing an opinion shared by many analysts, that not all agree with, but is by no means as off base as some here seem to think