Deke

using the argument of pace will always favor modern generations man. its a flawed *** argument. it cant be a valid argument if EVERY WAY you look at it favors modern generations...

the way i see it, you score what you score, you rebound what you rebound. everyone has different paces and factors but they did what they did, and thats right there. 27 ppg in the 60s is better then 24 ppg regardless of the era imo.

i dont look at kobes 35 and say ''well according to pace'' thats better then wilts 50 ppg. and so on so on...

its just a 1 sided view to always discredit the players of the past if you look at it like that.