Quote:
Originally posted by <b>NISMO</b>!
I am not saying he is a better point guard.. but a better player in general. and he's healthy. and cheap..
I would not want Terrell Brandon.. why would I want two guys who are paid a lot but barely play to due chronic injuries... instead of just having one in Dampier.. who's contract dosn't expire till 2005 or something like that.
and about the DC think.. I don't think so.. Why would you want a cancerous prensence in the locker room and a overpaid player. You already have that combination in the overpaid Dampier and becoming head case Fortson.
|
I don't like the Minnesota trade either, but what's not to like about the Philly trade? D.C.'s contract is up after next season. You'd basically just sit his a$$ at the end of the bench or maybe just waive the dude. You'd honestly rather have Danny Fortson for the next five years instead of D.C. for just one? WHAT?
The thing is, like I said, the goal at this point should be to just DUMP Fortson on whoever will take him. You're not going to get anything in return for the guy, fellas. That Philly trade I posted should make Warriors fans ecstatic!