![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#496 (permalink) | |
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 17,453
Rep Power: 62496
|
Re: CAA membership
Quote:
And you should include conferences like the CAA & MAAC- again, it's part of my main point. We don't need to be in a conference with them to show we can compete- we can just schedule them OOC and beat them.
__________________
"Let's win this game for all the small schools that never had a chance to get here" - Hoosiers, & UVM mens basketball NCAA's 2005 |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#497 (permalink) |
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 17,453
Rep Power: 62496
|
Re: CAA membership
Add in WAC, Mid-American, Horizon League..
__________________
"Let's win this game for all the small schools that never had a chance to get here" - Hoosiers, & UVM mens basketball NCAA's 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
#498 (permalink) |
|
All-Star
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Boston
Posts: 5,084
Rep Power: 32212
|
Re: CAA membership
My $0.02 on this whole Loyola to PL and ripple effects.
1. Siena isn't a CAA candidate. They only bring hoops to the table, and even now that is a highly diluted product (thanks Mitch!!!). With Albany in the fold for football, I don't think Yeager would blindside UA by adding Siena for all sports, he's not that kind of guy. 2. The MAAC has small schools of somewhat "similar" religious backgrounds (I'm Jewish, and while I respect the different versions of Christianity represented in the MAAC, they've always wanted smaller private religious backed organizations). I can't see them grabbing QC or anyone like that. Maybe, maybe a Monmouth or a Mt. St. Mary's - or in a longshot, St. Bonnie's. 3. The CAA would be more than happy at 10. The Rhody move to stay in the CAA for football lessened the blow if Davidson says no (then we wouldn't need to add an additional team or two for football), and solidified football. However, Rhody's decision to stay could also mean that App State sees the stability and makes the jump - with or without Davidson. 4. The "next" team in the PL? Well, there's a big gaping market between Boston and NYC, and that's the State of Connecticut. Does the PL go for Fairfield? I don't know. It does fit the academic profile, but the school is severely hurting financially. They do make sense.
__________________
Today is the first day of the next 86 years! |
|
|
|
|
|
#499 (permalink) | |
|
All-Star
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Boston
Posts: 5,084
Rep Power: 32212
|
Re: CAA membership
Quote:
__________________
Today is the first day of the next 86 years! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#500 (permalink) | |
|
All-Star
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 7,244
Rep Power: 37820
|
Re: CAA membership
Quote:
All things being equal, I guarantee you that Delaware and Towson would be #1 and #2 on the list. Not saying that they would or will come back..........but do you SERIOUSLY think that Drexel and Hofstra are in line before Delaware and Towson??? NO WAY that Stony Brook allows Hofstra back in now anyway, so that point is moot. I will begrudgingly give you NU being on the AE wish list because they desperately want a school in Boston and NU has sports that AE needs from new members (baseball, field hockey). Personally, I feel like Drexel is an absolutely POOR choice to ever return.........their athletic is one of the most flimsy in the region for a school their size. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#501 (permalink) |
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 17,453
Rep Power: 62496
|
Re: CAA membership
From Andy Katz the other day. Doesn't really say much except to call the CAA, MAAC, and AE "middling" conferences:
"3. The next wave of basketball alignment to watch will come from the America East, MAAC and CAA as those three middling conferences attempt to replace key departures. The America East and MAAC will be vying for the same teams while the CAA continues to likely look at poaching from the Southern Conference." http://espn.go.com/blog/collegebaske...3-point-shot-8
__________________
"Let's win this game for all the small schools that never had a chance to get here" - Hoosiers, & UVM mens basketball NCAA's 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
#502 (permalink) |
|
All-Star
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 7,244
Rep Power: 37820
|
Re: CAA membership
So Davidson has said NO........C of C is up next.
Dane96 pushing hard for Albany, Stony Brook and UNH all-sports membership over at the CAAZone............... ![]() Not sure why anyone would want to join that conference right now.......especially after having secured football membership. What is left over there that screams future greatness and stability???? |
|
|
|
|
|
#505 (permalink) | |
|
Star
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Boston
Posts: 3,419
Rep Power: 23593
|
Re: CAA membership
Quote:
Here is what I see: I honest to g-d see JMU leaving. I don't see UD leaving. I see no reason for any of the schools to want Furman, Elon or Coastal...unless it truly wants to be southern centric. Those schools have less in common with the most of the CAA. I see an NBC contract...that none of those three cities bringing any sort of market to the table in order for NBC to make money off of advertising slots. So...what I see is an eventual push back to a Yankee Conference style of league. IF that happens...i think Maine, b/c of football, is back in the picture and I think you sadly see a split of the AE/CAA(whatever its called) into two or three different leagues: All Sport Football All Sport Hoops North All Sport Hoops South The last two do not support football. It makes TOO much sense institution-wise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#506 (permalink) | |
|
Star
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Boston
Posts: 3,419
Rep Power: 23593
|
Re: CAA membership
Quote:
Case in point: SBU expanding to 10,000 football seats...and 15,000 in the future as publicly announced this week. 15,000 is the minimum attendence requirement...but I highly doubt even the MAC takes a school with a 15,000 seat stadium. That said, I have another reason to know that FBS isn't on the immediate table... "Here's my number...call me maybe" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#508 (permalink) |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,250
Rep Power: 216493
|
Re: CAA membership
Either way... UA/SBU are the linchpins. They can basically decide what they want here. Whichever conference they pick, they are basically dooming the other. The AE without those two basically becomes 5 schools looking for a life raft.
The CAA without those two is bracing for JMU's (and maybe GMU's) defection, or adding schools that are unappealing for whatever reason. |
|
|
|
|
|
#510 (permalink) |
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 17,453
Rep Power: 62496
|
Re: CAA membership
The CAA and AE are both weaker as a result of defections- but that's what one would expect when conferences lose key members.
It shouldn't be a surprise Davidson wouldn't want to join the CAA that same reason it's not a surprise Quinnipiac probably doesn't want to join the AE.
__________________
"Let's win this game for all the small schools that never had a chance to get here" - Hoosiers, & UVM mens basketball NCAA's 2005 |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (1 members and 1 guests) | |
| Aceinthehole |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|