Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SlickSpider
I still don't know what to think about GW. Obviously very talented, but they really stumbled to the finish line this year.
|
This is the worst, most incorrect piece of conventional wisdom I've ever seen.
GW won 18 of it's last 19 games. How is that stumbling to the finish line.
They trailed LaSalle when Pops got hurt and played a fantastic second half to run away with the game.
They beat Fordham by double figures. They beat the Bonnies by double figures (Bonnies hung around, but much credit goes to them for playing their best game in a few years).
And they won a close game against Charlotte with the miracle ending. But if anyone saw that game, they'd know it was more a case of Charlotte playing extremely well than GW struggling. Charlotte playing like a team that would win a first round game that day, as did GW.
The Temple game looks bad on paper, but it really seemed like GW didn't want to be there -- that they wanted to get healthy, take a break from all the controversy, and get ready for the tourney.
I guess people have an expectation that unless a 26-2 team is winning every game by 20 points from the first half on, they are "struglging" nevermind that virtually every team in America would be classified as struggling if that were the standard. I mean, you don't see people saying Washington struggled down teh stretch after losing to sub-150 Oregon, etc.