![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#181 (permalink) | ||||||||||
|
All-Star
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Westmont Illinois Cemetery
Age: 98
Posts: 5,235
Rep Power: 64500
|
re: 2012/13 Rankings, Including Bracketology
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Those of you who picked Xavier to finish ahead of Dayton in 2012-13 apparently didn’t do your homework, so I did it for you: Quote:
Quote:
C: Matt Kavanaugh and Alex Gavrilovic vs. Jeff Robinson and Jalen Reynolds. Advantage: Dayton PF: Josh Benson, Devin Oliver, and Devon Scott vs. Isaiah Philmore, Travis Taylor, and James Farr. Advantage: Dayton SF: Matt Derenbecker and Jalen Robinson vs. Justin Martin Advantage: Dayton SG: Vee Sanford and Dyshawn Pierre vs. Dezmine Wells, Brad Redford, and Myles Davis. Advantage: Xavier PG: Kevin Dillard and Khari Price vs. Semaj Christon and Dee Davis Advantage: Dayton Team Depth: Advantage: Dayton Rebounding: Advantage: Dayton 3-Point Shooting: Advantage: Dayton Game Coaching: Advantage: Even
__________________
BIG EAST CONFERENCE IN 2014-15 Butler • Creighton • Dayton • DePaul • Georgetown • Marquette
Providence • Seton Hall • St. John’s • Saint Louis • Villanova • Xavier Last edited by Muddy Waters; 07-31-2012 at 04:28 AM. Reason: predictions by SpiderInTheMixingBowl and MudFlap added. Thanks for the tip, a10nick. |
||||||||||
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#182 (permalink) | |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 1,507
Rep Power: 283887
|
re: 2012/13 Rankings, Including Bracketology
Quote:
Let the games begin!!!
__________________
I just want the team I support to be in a stronger conference. I'd prefer it to be a stronger A-10! To me that would mean every member would have at least 2 trips to the NCAA Tourney and 5 winning seasons during each 10-year cycle. It would also be great for every program to seriously challenge for a league title (either regular season or Tourney) at least once during that same period of time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#184 (permalink) | ||
|
All-Star
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Westmont Illinois Cemetery
Age: 98
Posts: 5,235
Rep Power: 64500
|
re: 2012/13 Rankings, Including Bracketology
In my humble opinion, I think Dayton has a good chance to finish in the Top 4 in the conference this year, behind 1. Saint Louis, 2. VCU, and 3. UMass. I expect Butler, St. Joseph's and Temple to fight it out for the next three places, followed by Xavier in 8th place, but the Muskies appear to be at risk of having an unexpectedly poor season with their depleted Roster. The Musketeers are solid at the SG position, but they have big question marks at the other four positions and they will be relying heavily on Isaiah Philmore, Semaj Christon, Dee Davis, and Jaylen Reynolds, who may or may not be as good as advertised. Richmond and La Salle look good for 9th and 10th place, with St. Bonaventure and George Washington taking the last two seeds for the Atlantic 10 Tournament in March. Watching the 2013 Atlantic 10 Tournament on TV: Charlotte, Rhode Island, Fordham, and Duquesne. Dayton and Xavier have one thing in common this season, and that is the possible loss (due to injury) of their respective key players. If Dayton loses Kevin Dillard or Xavier loses Dez Wells, they will plummet in the Final Atlantic 10 Standings. Quote:
__________________
BIG EAST CONFERENCE IN 2014-15 Butler • Creighton • Dayton • DePaul • Georgetown • Marquette
Providence • Seton Hall • St. John’s • Saint Louis • Villanova • Xavier |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#185 (permalink) | ||||||
|
All-Star
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Westmont Illinois Cemetery
Age: 98
Posts: 5,235
Rep Power: 64500
|
re: 2012/13 Rankings, Including Bracketology
More predictions (with Dayton finishing above Xavier): Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Are any Xavier fans going to post their predicted order of finish for the 2012-13 season ? a10nick ?
__________________
BIG EAST CONFERENCE IN 2014-15 Butler • Creighton • Dayton • DePaul • Georgetown • Marquette
Providence • Seton Hall • St. John’s • Saint Louis • Villanova • Xavier Last edited by Muddy Waters; 07-31-2012 at 04:28 AM. Reason: Muddy's predictions added. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#186 (permalink) |
|
Player
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 682
Rep Power: 145099
|
re: 2012/13 Rankings, Including Bracketology
Can't wait till laugh my ass off when we beat you... again, and again, and.... again.
__________________
Xavier likes to Play in the NCAA tournaments Dayton likes to host them while they play in the NIT |
|
|
|
|
|
#188 (permalink) |
|
Star
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Victory Parkway Xavier University
Posts: 3,607
Rep Power: 150436
|
re: 2012/13 Rankings, Including Bracketology
1. Get in the Dance. 2. Advance and Advance. I don't think X will win the A-10 this year, but I hope they will get another bid. The real season starts for me with the A-10 tournament. If you need to win and do, you're in the Dance. Rest of the stuff is window dressing to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#189 (permalink) |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,728
Rep Power: 348163
|
re: 2012/13 Rankings, Including Bracketology
1. Saint Louis (13-3) <= Best coach maybe and return everyone but Conklin from what could have been a Sweet 16 team.
2. Saint Joseph's (12-4) <= Great combination of talent and experience. 3. Xavier (11-5) <= Never bet against Xavier. Until proven otherwise, we assume they reload. 4. VCU (11-5) <= Great coach, talent, and a system. Have to avoid injuries with vending machines. 5. Butler (10-6) <= Great coach, talent, and a system. Have to protect their drinking fountains. 6. UMass (10-6) <= Mediocre coach, great talent. 7. Temple (10-6) <= Great coach, probably should be higher, but over whom? 8. Dayton (9-7) <= Perhaps Muddy is right, but I suspect he is wrong. 9. Richmond (8-8) <= Great coach, talent, but inexperienced. 10. LaSalle (8-8) <= Mediocre coach and talent. 11. St. Bonaventure (7-9) <= Good coach and some talent. 12. GW (6-10) <= Good coach, some talent, may take another year to implement system. 13. Charlotte (6-10) <= Mediocre coach and some talent. 14. Fordham (3-13) <= Good coach and mediocre talent. 15. Rhode Island (3-13) <= New coach and new roster. Bad year to be in that situation. 16. Duquesne (1-15) <= New coach and new roster. Bad year to be in that situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#190 (permalink) |
|
Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 927
Rep Power: 5128
|
re: 2012/13 Rankings, Including Bracketology
How in the world does Muddy actually think 2 starters for Dayton, who both sat out last year, and one who couldn't get off the bench in 2 years at GU, are making UD better than X at those positions?
Xavier has been to what, 12 out of the last 13 NCAA tournaments? I think a sane person would pick X and their proven history of winning, guys stepping up every year over UD and their proven record of underachieving. Also, you know Muddy is incorrect when puts the coaching category as a push.
__________________
When you live in Tool City, you care what the mayor thinks. - Blue Dog (September 9, 2009) Last edited by El Shaqtus; 07-29-2012 at 08:00 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#191 (permalink) | |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 1,507
Rep Power: 283887
|
re: 2012/13 Rankings, Including Bracketology
Quote:
Frankly, I put little (actually NO) stock in pre-season predictions of any kind. While certain types of speculation can be fun and amusing (such as trying to guess how all this conference-changing will play out in the end), I see virtually no reason to hazard a guess how the 16 teams in the A-10 will finish in the coming season when each of them has experienced significant changes from within. If that were not enough, you are asking us to determine how all those changes will work with regard to match-ups against the other 15 members of the Conference. I have not (in person) seen any new Xavier player perform on the floor. I have no idea what roles they will play as they take their places on the 2012-2013 Musketeer team. I don't yet know how this coming Xavier team's chemistry will be. And I even don't know yet how markedly changed (improved) our returning players will be. Add all that batch of unknowns of my own favorite team to the fact that I know infinitely less about the other 15 teams in the A-10 and even you might be able to see what an exercise in futility a pre-season prognostication would be. However, the deciding factor in my decision NOT to take up your challenge is the fact that I have seen how others (especially you) have fared in the past when they have made such predictions. Why would I want to make myself look that silly to the vast majority of this Board's readers whom I have grown to like and respect over the years?
__________________
I just want the team I support to be in a stronger conference. I'd prefer it to be a stronger A-10! To me that would mean every member would have at least 2 trips to the NCAA Tourney and 5 winning seasons during each 10-year cycle. It would also be great for every program to seriously challenge for a league title (either regular season or Tourney) at least once during that same period of time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#192 (permalink) | |
|
The Professor
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Section 104, Cintas Center
Posts: 993
Rep Power: 168143
|
re: 2012/13 Rankings, Including Bracketology
Quote:
__________________
Xavier always goes to the NCAA tournament, and almost always makes some noise while there. Projecting anything less than that this season feels like folly. Eamonn Brennan, ESPN (Summer Shootaround, 2012) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#193 (permalink) |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Valdosta, GA (Title town)
Age: 33
Posts: 2,076
Rep Power: 142982
|
re: 2012/13 Rankings, Including Bracketology
Without any clue at all what Kansas in the big 12, OSU and Mich St. In big 10, KY and FL in the SEC, UNC and Duke in the ACC, Syracuse and Louisville is the BE, or Gonzaga in the WCC bring back next year. I have full confidence they will be players in their league.
Temple and Xavier are that to the A10. |
|
|
|
|
|
#195 (permalink) |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 1,507
Rep Power: 283887
|
re: 2012/13 Rankings, Including Bracketology
I'm not sure I understand your point, X-man47. I addressed my comments to Muddy and described MY reasons for not being interested in making such predictions. There was nothing in my comments that would suggest that I was speaking for anyone other than myself, Mudflap included. I concluded by stressing the point that Muddy's predictions in the past have been laughably inaccurate and I didn't want to look as silly.
__________________
I just want the team I support to be in a stronger conference. I'd prefer it to be a stronger A-10! To me that would mean every member would have at least 2 trips to the NCAA Tourney and 5 winning seasons during each 10-year cycle. It would also be great for every program to seriously challenge for a league title (either regular season or Tourney) at least once during that same period of time. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|