![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,300
Rep Power: 39489
|
Re: More BCS realignment
The timing intrigues me.
Whether the B1G wanted to send a signal to ND or not, which doesn't seem realistic, given this out-of-the-blue timing, it most certainly torpedoed the BE's ability to get any form of relevant television money. The BE is about to go from above the other four to basically tied with or barely better than them, in terms of finances. Understanding that any agreement(s) will include adjustment clauses for further realignment activity, how do you price this much instability right now - - advertising schedules have to be mapped out, projected ratings are based on certain assumed markets, etc. So many have jumped ship. UConn and UL are watching the water level come towards their feet. UL clearly is the most attractive program left in the BE now, at least with respect to its breadwinner sports. They may lose out due to the ACC's academic disposition. In that case, UConn would get the call, but would be a comparatively weak addition, given their newness and comparatively small stadium. Then again, schools like BC and Wake aren't going to make much noise about any of that. In my opinion, UC and the others are already lost below deck with respect to solving for any form of a BCS affiliation. I can't see UC making a jump to any of the Big5. They can't make it academically. They certainly aren't going to make it with Nippert Stadium. With very few exceptions - I can only think of Pitt and Miami at present (both weak ACC schools at that) - these Big4 titans like to see very big on campus venues that are fully stocked for home games, when it comes to evaluating new conference mates. Television money for the BE is heading south. Otherwise, between the ACC and most likely the B12, UConn and UL are still hoping that there is room in a couple of the life boats. The others are losing the coveted BCS seal of approval anyway, but will have to put something together where the best among them can still fight for that one premier slot, for as long as the B4(5) keep it available. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Star
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,819
Rep Power: 157851
|
Re: More BCS realignment
And yet Dayton and Temple have roughly the same chance of ever being competitive at a high level of football. None.
I honestly think Temple fans are going to look back in 7-10 years and wish they had stayed in the A10/MAC. It was a gamble they had to take, but I don't see it paying off. Long term, the Big East or whatever becomes of it is not a viable football league, and league-wide the basketball is going to suffer for it. Could be Temple and Memphis just hanging out, drunk and staring at Houston, ECU, and SMU, wondering what the heck happened.
__________________
Sure, I've been called a xenophobe, but the truth is, I'm not. I honestly just feel that America is the best country and the other countries aren't as good. That used to be called patriotism. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Star
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Wynnewood, PA/Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,598
Rep Power: 6196
|
Re: More BCS realignment
Quote:
__________________
Temple Owls football and basketball BU Terriers hockey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Star
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,537
Rep Power: 12822
|
Re: More BCS realignment
Worst case we join a strengthed CUSA which is better for football than MAC so the move had to happen. Who knows if the Big East collapses what happens. If the catholic schools split then we would have been in the same position either way. Being with Cincinnati, Memphis and the rest of CUSA or a hybrid league of other conferences isn't a disaster but certainly not what we wanted. If the catholic schools stay then basketball will be in better position, if they can keep a football league even better. Nothing is catastrophic for Temple but there are a few scenerios better than others obviously.
__________________
Temple Owls have won a lot. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,300
Rep Power: 39489
|
Re: More BCS realignment
Quote:
Either way, this isn't over with today's news. More movement is most certainly coming. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
Star
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,537
Rep Power: 12822
|
Re: More BCS realignment
I would love that but I can't see it happening. Only way Temple comes back to the A10 for basketball is if the catholic league forms and even then the prospect of joining without Xavier, Dayton, Butler maybe VCU etc would lose it's value. I would guess it's all Big East, Big East basketball/CUSA Football or all CUSA for us.
__________________
Temple Owls have won a lot. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,009
Rep Power: 8401
|
Re: More BCS realignment
It is in Temple's best interest to have all of their sports in one conference, while establishing relationships with like-minded institutions who play 1-A football. The MAC/A-10 arrangement was be untenable long-term.
I'd love to be in the A-10 for basketball, but playing football in the MAC is awful. That said, neither conference is lucrative enough for a long-term commitment at this point. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
Star
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,537
Rep Power: 12822
|
Re: More BCS realignment
I think UMass will probably be the first selection to fill a hole or one of the top ones. Interesting decision for them... Pretty much the same decision we faced a year ago.
__________________
Temple Owls have won a lot. |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Omaha
Posts: 73
Rep Power: 2829
|
Re: More BCS realignment
UConn to ACC.
UMass to Big East. New addition must have football and this is UMass' big chance to move their FB up a level. Fordham to Patriot League. Creighton and Wichita St to A10, further expanding its footprint into the Central Time Zone, gobbling up two committed basketball schools that don't have football programs, while decimating the MVC at the same time. The new additions allow for TV doubleheaders on weeknights with games starting at 7pm and 9pm eastern (6pm and 8 pm central). With the CAA, Horizon and MVC left in ruins, A10 is well situated to improve Tv contracts by taking the spots previously filled by those other conferences. |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) | |
|
Star
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,747
Rep Power: 12506
|
Re: More BCS realignment
Quote:
If the closest A-10 school to Kingston were the Philly schools or SBU in western NY, URI would have to seriously consider other options. URI would actually be a better fit in the CAA if that were to happen. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) |
|
All-Star
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Westmont Illinois Cemetery
Age: 98
Posts: 5,236
Rep Power: 64500
|
Re: More BCS realignment
__________________
BIG EAST CONFERENCE IN 2014-15 Butler • Creighton • Dayton • DePaul • Georgetown • Marquette
Providence • Seton Hall • St. John’s • Saint Louis • Villanova • Xavier |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) | |
|
Benchwarmer
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 134
Rep Power: 6236
|
Re: More BCS realignment
Quote:
It's all about money. Maryland is in some dire financial situations right now, and joining the Big Ten pretty much kisses them goodbye. Personally, as a born and raised Marylander who has rooted for the Terps for all my life, I hate this. I don't care much for MD football (and really, not many people do). It's going to be really disappointing to not have two games against Duke every season. Plus, MD has rivalries in the ACC, dating back to the 50s. The closest "rivalry" in the Big Ten would be Penn St., and that is just because of geographic proximity. I do believe that if MD goes, this may set off a wave of further conference realignment. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|