![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#286 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Western Mass
Posts: 1,814
Rep Power: 247596
|
Re: More BCS realignment
Quote:
Nobody is claiming that; however the BE did start this whole "sper conference" thing when they went to 16 teams, and that is when these much bigger dominos started to fall.
__________________
Well, we were smaller, but at least we were slower! |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#289 (permalink) |
|
Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 780
Rep Power: 145273
|
Re: More BCS realignment
I am having a hard time believing that the Charlotte AD is happy to be thrown into that collection of mutts that now comprise CUSA. With the exception of Tulsa and Rice, I think the rest of those schools have open admissions, or whatever the politically correct term is.
I am sure that the Tulsa and Rice ADs are spending every waking hour trying to figure out how to get their schools out of there. Twenty years ago Rice was in a conference with Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech, SMU, TCU, Houston, Baylor. Now they look at North Texas, FIU, FAU, La. Tech, UT-San Antonio, UTEP. How would you like to be the guy trying to sell football season tickets at Rice? Buy a six pack of Pepsi, get a free football ticket.
__________________
If you are going to have sex with an animal, make sure it is a horse. That way, if it does not work out, you always have a ride home. So sayeth Willie Nelson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#290 (permalink) |
|
Player
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 818
Rep Power: 265738
|
Re: More BCS realignment
I wish the southern Ivies conference had gotten going way back when. Vanderbilt, Rice, Tulane, SMU, Duke, etc.
Obviously it was never even close to happening, but I am more and more drawn to the current Ivy League because I know all the schools there care about a) school b) being in a conference with like minded schools.
__________________
"Careful reading comprehension is crucial to an online forum discussion." |
|
|
|
|
|
#291 (permalink) | |
|
Benchwarmer
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 117
Rep Power: 1579
|
Re: More BCS realignment
Quote:
The SEC kicked off the latest round of realignment mania by being the first to go beyond twelve teams and if the current five power conferences get reduced to four it will have been because of the B1G's most recent move. Unfortuantely, the remainder of college football and basketball operate at the mercy of those two conferences, Texas and Notre Dame. It sucks for fans of teams outside of that elite group plus the PAC, but unless there is a fundamental change in the economics college sports, we're stuck watching our favorite team fight over whatever remains of the pie after the power players have determined the size of the pie and have taken their slices. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#293 (permalink) | |
|
All-Star
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 7,246
Rep Power: 37820
|
Re: More BCS realignment
Quote:
The ACC could end up looking like this eventually: BC UConn Syracuse Temple Pitt Cincinnati Memphis Louisville Duke Wake Forest Central Florida South Florida *Notre Dame *St. John's *Nova *Georgetown * All sports excluding football This may be the best that the ACC can do if the unthinkable happens. The A-10 could go after DePaul and Marquette........possibly Providence and Seton Hall as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#294 (permalink) |
|
6th Man
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 402
Rep Power: 42
|
Re: More BCS realignment
The day that providence and URI end up in the same conference is the day that the state of RI finally falls in the ocean.
This would be because the ground would shake with all the URI fans laughing after 30 years of supposed PC superiority, and the ocean would come fill the vacuum left by the deep gasps from the PC fans of having "sunk" to URI's level |
|
|
|
|
|
#295 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,300
Rep Power: 39489
|
Re: More BCS realignment
Quote:
Still, I think the odds are against the ACC, in whatever form it ends up, taking in hoops only programs, because the conference obviously has a strong bias for the all-sports format and, more importantly, its ultimate composition is going to have to be able to effectively address its Olympic Sports requirements. With respect to the latter, there is no way the basketball schools can fund the number of sports that the football schools fund. Then again, as the football school's lose funding, perhaps they cut sports out. We'll see. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#297 (permalink) |
|
Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 780
Rep Power: 145273
|
Re: More BCS realignment
when I think of big cities, I must confess that Omaha is not the first thing to come to my mind. Or even medium sized cities.
__________________
If you are going to have sex with an animal, make sure it is a horse. That way, if it does not work out, you always have a ride home. So sayeth Willie Nelson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#298 (permalink) | |
|
Player
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 818
Rep Power: 265738
|
Re: More BCS realignment
Quote:
St. Louis: 318,000 Pittsburgh: 305,000 Cincinnati: 297,000 Buffalo: 261,000 Richmond 205,000 Dayton 142,000 . . . Olean 15,000 Edit: Obviously using just the city limits numbers doesn't give the total picture.
__________________
"Careful reading comprehension is crucial to an online forum discussion." Last edited by Bona Wolf for Pope; 11-29-2012 at 01:58 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#299 (permalink) | |
|
Player
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 998
Rep Power: 64147
|
Re: More BCS realignment
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#300 (permalink) | |
|
Benchwarmer
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 117
Rep Power: 1579
|
Re: More BCS realignment
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|