![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1171 (permalink) | |
|
Star
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Flagship City
Posts: 2,900
Rep Power: 169415
|
Re: More BCS realignment
nevermind
__________________
Muddy's from 2009 Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#1172 (permalink) | ||
|
Star
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Flagship City
Posts: 2,900
Rep Power: 169415
|
Re: More BCS realignment
Quote:
__________________
Muddy's from 2009 Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#1173 (permalink) |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 2235
|
Re: More BCS realignment
Another possibility - UConn, Cincinnati, and Memphis join the new BE7 in the basketball focused conference leaving their football teams behind.
Several A10 schools could be in process of being jerked around. I know most UD fans want to join the BE7, but I don't think any A10 schools should be offended in they are not in the BE7 discussion - you may be the lucky ones. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1174 (permalink) | |
|
Player
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 510
Rep Power: 90
|
Re: More BCS realignment
Quote:
These Catholic schools without football know UConn and UC are likely to end up in the ACC within the next few years if any more expansion happens (the ACC is highly likely to be raided again soon). I think the BE7 teams who have seen 10 conference mates leave in the last 10 years are sick of the revolving door. Adding teams without football programs would actually lead to a very stable conference. Particularly if they can achieve their goal of making the best basketball-only conference in the country. Where else would a team want to go? There would be no upgrade possible and thus no incentive to leave. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1175 (permalink) | |
|
Star
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,836
Rep Power: 37278
|
Quote:
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using VerticalSports.Com App |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1176 (permalink) | |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 1,507
Rep Power: 283887
|
Re: More BCS realignment
Quote:
(edited)
__________________
I just want the team I support to be in a stronger conference. I'd prefer it to be a stronger A-10! To me that would mean every member would have at least 2 trips to the NCAA Tourney and 5 winning seasons during each 10-year cycle. It would also be great for every program to seriously challenge for a league title (either regular season or Tourney) at least once during that same period of time. Last edited by xu95; 12-17-2012 at 08:15 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1177 (permalink) | |
|
Star
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,836
Rep Power: 37278
|
Quote:
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using VerticalSports.Com App |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1178 (permalink) |
|
6th Man
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 344
Rep Power: 4614
|
Re: More BCS realignment
Food for thought. Are the BE-7 "going forward" a better group than the current A-10? If the A-10 sticks together I believe they will be better than the BE-7.
__________________
University of Richmond 2008 FCS Football National Champions! |
|
|
|
|
|
#1179 (permalink) |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: North Quabbin region
Posts: 1,727
Rep Power: 4198
|
Re: More BCS realignment
We have over 2 years to see how it plays out. There is too much money on the table for the BE7 to violate by-laws and they have to wait 27 months. Unless they have excellent lawyers or give concessions to the Big East conference. The big thing for us is to see what happens to UConn, Cincy, Memphis, and Temple. The A10/MAC combo is a great fit for us. It will be interesting to see how this all plays out. The A10 will always be a good league and have multiple bids.
__________________
Collection of Sports links |
|
|
|
|
|
#1180 (permalink) |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 22
Rep Power: 0
|
Re: More BCS realignment
Let's just say for sake of argument that the A10 loses Xavier, Richmond and St. Louis. (But really you could insert any combination of possible candidates.)
What if the remaining A10 schools with "strong" resumes, facilities, history, dedication to winning, etc...decide to to pull a similar move? I don't want to name who these potential schools could be because I'm not looking to stir a debate with who belongs in that group and who doesn't. Just simply put forth the possibility that could some of these remaining take their ball and go play with other like minded teams from other conferences in yet another new hybrid league? |
|
|
|
|
|
#1181 (permalink) |
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Shanghai, China
Age: 32
Posts: 1,051
Rep Power: 192540
|
Re: More BCS realignment
I think that's correct, but that's not really the question being asked. The A10 teams cannot reasonably be expected to look out for the conference's well-being, only their own. I think this is a lesson that realignment has made painfully clear. So the only question is will the reconsituted A10 be better than the BE7 and whatever programs they choose to invite.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1183 (permalink) |
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Shanghai, China
Age: 32
Posts: 1,051
Rep Power: 192540
|
Re: More BCS realignment
I think if we could go farther back in time knowing what we know now, all the big name football schools would want to form specific football only conferences while leaving their other sports in their relatively sensible geographically based leagues. Too late now!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1184 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,300
Rep Power: 39489
|
Re: More BCS realignment
Quote:
The BE7 just made a strategic decision to cut away from football. Period. End of story. The only nexus that may exist between the BE7 and the football schools are a few - very few - Georgetown fans who bring up the idea of Gtown still being an option for the ACC. They tend to get shouted down by their colleagues. These schools are moving forward to optimize a hoops-centric conference. They'll fill in as they and television execs deem appropriate. Anything involving football schools at this point for those 7 schools is non-sense. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1185 (permalink) | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 76
Rep Power: 2235
|
Re: More BCS realignment
Quote:
If the thought threatens you, thats not my problem. If X does join the new conference, you will fit in nicely with the arrogant BE7. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|