![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#31 (permalink) |
|
Player
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Winston-Salem
Posts: 589
Rep Power: 482
|
Re: The Future A10 Thread
My guess is Davidson isn't going anywhere. They have it made with almost automatic NCAA bids in their terrible conference. They can stand to lose their competitive OOC games and roll through conference play.
__________________
Charlotte 49ers message board |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#32 (permalink) | |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 59
Rep Power: 656
|
Re: The Future A10 Thread
Quote:
Adding some of the schools being bandied about is just asking for multiple Fordhams. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) | |
|
Star
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,819
Rep Power: 157851
|
Re: The Future A10 Thread
Quote:
Make Murray and Wichita say no. I'm guessing Murray would say yes, and Wichita would do their homework before answering (probably a no, but maybe not). I'd even look at schools like Evansville, Indiana State, Illinois State. The Valley is a nice league that might be ripe for the picking without Creighton. Test the waters. George Mason is a no-brainer. The other Eastern options all seem like plan Bs.
__________________
Sure, I've been called a xenophobe, but the truth is, I'm not. I honestly just feel that America is the best country and the other countries aren't as good. That used to be called patriotism. Last edited by AdamtheFlyer; 02-28-2013 at 08:56 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Omaha
Posts: 73
Rep Power: 2829
|
Re: The Future A10 Thread
If Creighton is indeed gone, Bradley is the MVC school that the A10 should take a look at. Very good attendance, tremendous tradition and located on the outskirts of Chicago. Frankly, if Creighton is gone, all of the private schools in the MVC will be looking around.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 50
Rep Power: 73
|
Re: The Future A10 Thread
With Dayton, XU, Butler and SLU joining the C7 and Temple and Charlotte already out the door the A10 would be down to "only" 10.
Likely, the A10 will be looking for new schools to replace the departing ones. George Mason is probably the most obvious choice: good recent success, good size of school and fan attendence. Sticking in the CAA, Old Dominion is really struggling this year but you get the Tidewater market. Unfortunately, they're going to the CUSA. Barring them, UNC-Wimington has good attendence and a decent size market. Also consider JMU and Delaware from the CAA. If Creighton is available, the A10 could go that route but I don't know if Creighton would want to travel that far and, with XU, Butler, DU and SLU gone, I don't know if the A10 would want to go west. If so, throw in Wichita St or Bradley from the Valley Creighton to team up with. These programs play in front of larger arenas with loyal fans - kind of like Dayton (but better). This would essentially replace SLU and Dayton. Staying out in the midwest, the A10 could steal Detroit and/or Valpo from the Horizon. Maybe even Cleveland State. If the A10 wants to stay East: Siena is a good choice. 15k areana with strong amont of success over the last 15 years and Albany market (ok, maybe the capital of NY State is not all that desirable). BU and Northeastern are also options (especially if you like college hockey). Heading south, Davidson has been running an excellent program for a long time and is a basketball crazed state. Also in the Southern conf, Charleston is a beatiful school in a gorgious town with tons of hot women. Their baskeball team is pretty good too. I'd add GMU, Siena, Davidson and either Northeastern (if you want another northern school) or Charleston (if you want the best option). Last edited by bobo; 02-28-2013 at 09:28 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) | |
|
Player
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 679
Rep Power: 4554
|
Re: The Future A10 Thread
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) | |
|
Star
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,872
Rep Power: 252640
|
Re: The Future A10 Thread
Quote:
I think it would be a great add by the league, since Davidson will always be committed to hoops. Success in college basketball is more about stability rather than the idea of who's putting in the most money. Yea money is great, but look at UVA, that's a school for years that has invested as much or more than anyone financially into hoops, but they haven't been really relevant since Gillen was there (certainly more relevant this year). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 (permalink) |
|
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 19
Rep Power: 0
|
Re: The Future A10 Thread
What if Cinci, UConn, and Memphis all find their way to other conferences and Temple gets left behind? Would they come back to the A10?
Also, I agree that there are some prospects in the Midwest but I like the idea of eventually going south with Davidson, and maybe Belmont and Charleston too. For next season maybe do nothing or add GMU and Siena. Those are the two most obvious schools to add imo. |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 (permalink) | |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,349
Rep Power: 298524
|
Re: The Future A10 Thread
Quote:
__________________
we don't suck |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 (permalink) |
|
6th Man
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 287
Rep Power: 9154
|
Re: The Future A10 Thread
If what ESPN writes is true, and in the interest of keeping this a muddy-free zone, let's assume X, BUT, STL, ud are gone. We know TEM, CHAR are gone. That leaves UMASS, URI, FORD, LAS, SJU, VCU, RICH, GW, DUQ, SBU. 10 teams. I don't see a reason to expand to 12 unless we could get either of the following combos: Detroit/Valpo, Detroit/GMU, GMU/Davidson. I don't like Siena, Boston, NE, Hofstra, Drexel for various reasons, but mainly because they're flash in the pan types. I'd consider Belmont but only if the conference goes south instead of midwest.
Now, we have to presume UMASS pursues FBS football and has 1.5 feet out the door already. My preference would be to get back to 10 with Detroit, but I'd take a Detroit/Valpo/GMU trifecta if it was available and we could have an E/W 12 team league. I guess RICH/VCU would be in the "west".. wow. Otherwise my pecking order for single team expansion onlywould be Detroit, Valpo, Davidson, GMU, then <TBD> - Cleveland St, Belmont come to mind but aren't very attractive. With or wihtout UMASS, this is a 1+ bid league. I can't see us getting more than one at-large, sometimes 0 if the reg/tourn champ are the same. My final option would be for SBU to join the Horizon League, hopefully (?) along with DUQ. That is less perferable to staying in the A-10. The conference still has a good brand. It won't fall to Horizon levels. Yet. We have to face it, our flagship - Temple - was a big hit. Our flagship-in-waiting - X - is another big hit. Butler wasn't around long enough for us to reap their benefits. St. Louis is really looking good but as an A-10 member never lived up to potential. I will miss them though. Charlotte? What to say.. keep dominating non-revenue sports? And dayton had a few good seasons, but is replaceable by any of those expansion schools indicated. They're X's tag-along little brother anyway. As long as they remain in X's conference they'll never have top billing. Good luck with that.
__________________
http://www.gobonnies.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 (permalink) |
|
Community Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cincinnati
Age: 40
Posts: 3,576
Rep Power: 332174
|
Re: The Future A10 Thread
I can honestly say I have enjoyed my teams time in the A10. The conference did us a huge favor by getting us out of the piss poor MCC. I hope for the sake of the conference you still get multiple bids in the NCAA tournament.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 (permalink) |
|
6th Man
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 287
Rep Power: 9154
|
Re: The Future A10 Thread
Thank YOU, xu95, and I believe most X fans feel the same way. That's why we all appreciate X, and root for X. Clearly ud suffers from inferiority complex and have taken to a "bash the A-10 on our way out the door" mentality, and the backlash from us posters is warranted. Ingrates, almost all of them. Coming from a team that is far more known for the court they play on than the product they put on it. Continue to enjoy hosting the NCAA "First Four" flyers. Maybe someday you'll get to play in it as well.
__________________
http://www.gobonnies.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 (permalink) |
|
Star
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,742
Rep Power: 12506
|
Re: The Future A10 Thread
As a fan of the northeastern most member of the league (URI), I don't like some of the names beng thrown around for reasons of geography. If GMU was added, we would have FOUR schools in the DC to Richmond corridor and two more just up the road in Philly. That is a very high concentration of schools in such a small area. Talk of Umass possibly leaving and replacing them with a midwest or southern school also makes me uneasy as the league center moves further away.
With URI as one of the three remaining publics, I also have reservations about adding more small Catholic schools and giving that faction more power in league matters. Furthermore, if the A-10 became more Catholic school based, it makes it harder to differentiate itself from the Big East Catholic CYO league as the A-10 would merely be the CYO Junior Varsity. A lot of factors will need to be considered in selecting new members - program success, past atendance, facilities, tv market, geography, and school type are just a few that come to mind. Last edited by RF1; 03-01-2013 at 06:51 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 (permalink) |
|
Benchwarmer
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 220
Rep Power: 832
|
Re: The Future A10 Thread
I would avoid George Mason like the plague. Their leadership has no vision as they have wasted every opportunity given to them after their Final Four run. They now have an overpaid coach who couldn't get it done with All-Americans let alone mid major talent. They have horrible fan support. They are 10-7 in a miserable CAA.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|