 |
|
04-30-2005, 07:36 PM
|
#121 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bristol, CT
Age: 20
Posts: 3,433
|
Re: GAME 4: Celtics at Pacers (2-1)
Pierce is done for the night.
30 points, 8 assists, 7 rebounds, 5 blocks, 1 steal 10-15 shooting.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
04-30-2005, 07:38 PM
|
#122 (permalink)
|
|
Knighty Night
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Nightmare Bvld
Age: 26
Posts: 14,348
|
Re: GAME 4: Celtics at Pacers (2-1)
The lead just keeps growing.
Seriously, do you guys think we can win by 40?
|
|
|
04-30-2005, 07:39 PM
|
#123 (permalink)
|
|
Celtics Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 16,800
|
Re: GAME 4: Celtics at Pacers (2-1)
Quote:
[17:51] BBBPremier: hopefully it's an exciting game
[17:51] aquaitious: no
[17:51] aquaitious: hopefully we blow them out
[17:51] BBBPremier: that too
|
|
|
|
04-30-2005, 07:40 PM
|
#124 (permalink)
|
|
Celtics Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 16,800
|
Re: GAME 4: Celtics at Pacers (2-1)
The Indiana Pacers hit a field-goal. Oh my.
|
|
|
04-30-2005, 07:40 PM
|
#125 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bristol, CT
Age: 20
Posts: 3,433
|
Re: GAME 4: Celtics at Pacers (2-1)
Interesting question that Tommy and Mike brought up.
Do we stick with the small ball lineup?
|
|
|
04-30-2005, 07:41 PM
|
#126 (permalink)
|
|
Celtics Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 16,800
|
Re: GAME 4: Celtics at Pacers (2-1)
Tony Allen with another big block and he leads the break, but Justin Reed cannot hit the up and under. Good fast-break, though.
|
|
|
04-30-2005, 07:42 PM
|
#127 (permalink)
|
|
Celtics Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 16,800
|
Re: GAME 4: Celtics at Pacers (2-1)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lanteri
Interesting question that Tommy and Mike brought up.
Do we stick with the small ball lineup?
|
Certainly not. We surprised Carlisle tonight and he didn't prepare for it. This time, Carlisle will prepare for both lineups so he'll be ready for game five. In my opinion, to confuse the Pacers we should shuffle between regular and small ball in game five.
|
|
|
04-30-2005, 07:44 PM
|
#128 (permalink)
|
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St. Bonaventure, NY
Age: 23
Posts: 6,862
|
Re: GAME 4: Celtics at Pacers (2-1)
Lets confuse the crap out of him. Start Perkins, Reed, Allen, and Banks. Just go with four players to start.
|
|
|
04-30-2005, 07:44 PM
|
#129 (permalink)
|
|
Never Forgotten
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 13,093
|
Re: GAME 4: Celtics at Pacers (2-1)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lanteri
Interesting question that Tommy and Mike brought up.
Do we stick with the small ball lineup?
|
I think it comes down to how Walker will be able to play from the bench.
I would love for Toine to go out and sit himself...from the starting line up and to tell Rivers that he'll be able to help off the bench vs the Pacers.
Also I'm sure the pacers will be ready for another game like this. This caught them by surprise and Carlisle will surely be prepared for it.
|
|
|
04-30-2005, 07:44 PM
|
#130 (permalink)
|
|
Celtics Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 16,800
|
Re: GAME 4: Celtics at Pacers (2-1)
aqua, still think Tony Allen is an average defender, nothing more.
Allen just disrupted another shot.
|
|
|
04-30-2005, 07:44 PM
|
#131 (permalink)
|
|
Player
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 953
|
Re: GAME 4: Celtics at Pacers (2-1)
we are blowing them out!!!
|
|
|
04-30-2005, 07:45 PM
|
#132 (permalink)
|
|
Never Forgotten
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 13,093
|
Re: GAME 4: Celtics at Pacers (2-1)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by agoo101284
Lets confuse the crap out of him. Start Perkins, Reed, Allen, and Banks. Just go with four players to start.
|
 hahahaha.
|
|
|
04-30-2005, 07:45 PM
|
#133 (permalink)
|
|
Celtics Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 16,800
|
Re: GAME 4: Celtics at Pacers (2-1)
Marcus Banks, our best three-point shooter, hits his first of the game.
|
 | |