Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DK
Sure. Assists, when evaluating one player's ability, are meaningless because they are relevant to team success, rather than individual skill.
|
I don't understand the logic here. Just because assists are relevant to team success, that means they should be considered meaningless in evaluating a player's ability? A player's scoring ability is certainly relevant to team success; does that make it meaningless to consider it when evaluating the individual?
Quote:
|
However, it has not been proven that high assist totals, when field goals made are relatively equal, have a defining impact on a game's victor.
|
Well of course, because you are making the assumption that FGs made are equal. If that's the case, then obviously the amount of points scored will be around the same.
Quote:
The teams in the lottery averaged 1748 assists each.
The teams in the playoffs averaged 1742 assists each.
By showing how close in proximity assists are within good teams and bad teams, it shows that it has very little impact.
|
Didn't you say earlier that assists are relevant to team success? I think you just pulled a flip-Ginobili.
Regardless, your use of statistics is faulty. If you just look at total points scored, Detroit would come in near the bottom. When looking at the value of a statistic, you can't just analyze totals by one team; you have to compare it to their opponents, because they played under the same other variables (ie, pace).
If you look at team assist differentials per game (vs. their opponents) over the regular season, 4 of the top 7 teams are San Antonio, Phoenix, Miami, and Detroit.