 |
|
12-15-2007, 10:56 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: San Diego
Age: 15
Posts: 3,939
|
Re: Patterson now available?
No way. That would be really stupid.
I hope they're not even considering this.
There's no need for him. We have the best starting 2-3 in the league in Allen and Pierce, and backing them up you have Posey, who logged major minutes on a championship team, and Tony Allen, when healthy is a solid player. Use that money a roster space on a backup big man, since only Garnett, Davis and Perkins to some point look good.
Anyways, if Patterson is signed, there's more bad that can come out of it than good. He carries a lot of baggage, he's a sex offender, he would complain about playing time, and his style of play doesnt allow him to play off the ball. We already have good defenders at the wing in Posey, Pierce and Tony Allen.
__________________
Current Celtics Roster:
PG- Rajon Rondo, Eddie House, Gabe Pruitt
SG- Ray Allen, Tony Allen, J.R. Giddens
SF- Paul Pierce, Bill Walker
PF- Kevin Garnett, Leon Powe, Brian Scalabrine
C- Kendrick Perkins, Glen Davis, Patrick O'Bryant
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
12-15-2007, 08:34 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Southern New England
Age: 21
Posts: 1,082
|
Re: Patterson now available?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus13
I dont know, I feel pretty comfortable with where we are at the 2/3. IMO we need to get our hands on a 1 or a 4/5
|
Marcus! I'm finally home, man. I can FINALLY start watching games and provide mediocre commentary. But I'm digressing...
I definitely feel that, while Patterson could provide some good play for us, he does not really fill any voids that this team currently has. As a 6-5 SF who has no 3-point shooting OR freethrow skills, and does not exactly provide much other than a decent low-post presence, where does that put Ruben on our team? In terms of "undersized" post players, I'd rather see Big Baby banging around in the post than Ruben, to be quite honest. I feel as though he would just be an unnecessary addition to a team which would be much better off staying patient in a league where players are readily available over different parts of the season. We're 19-2. Let's enjoy the moment, keep an "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mentality, and wait for more suitable free agents to hit the market, as opposed to pouncing on the first guy out there. Besides, if anything, we need another 4/5 guy. Another PF/C who can hit the boards, get some easy dunks/lay-ins, get to the ft line, and provide a low post presence. Rondo has proven to me that another PG should not be the Celtics priority for picking up a FA this season.
__________________
You're insulting me with this 10 horsepower piece of crap!
- Meatwad, Aquateen Hunger Force
|
|
|
12-15-2007, 08:51 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
Banned Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 186
|
Re: Patterson now available?
Celtics need to pick Diop up and spend the full mle and then the vet minimum for Cassell.
|
|
|
12-15-2007, 08:55 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
NBA Champions
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Australia
Age: 21
Posts: 10,289
|
Re: Patterson now available?
Quote:
Originally Posted by dropkickmeltinjohns
Celtics need to pick Diop up and spend the full mle and then the vet minimum for Cassell.
|
If at all possible that would be ideal, im sure we will almost have the pick of whoever we want with the MLE...
Also depends whether we want to keep House
|
|
|
12-15-2007, 08:57 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
I piss excellence
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: ****ty new hampshire
Posts: 7,001
|
Re: Patterson now available?
Diop yes, Cassell no
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Porn_Player
I think Jacoby needs sex therapy rehab.
|
|
|
|
12-15-2007, 08:59 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
|
NBA Champions
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Australia
Age: 21
Posts: 10,289
|
Re: Patterson now available?
Cassel would be a great back up for the minimum
|
|
|
12-15-2007, 09:03 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St. Bonaventure, NY
Age: 23
Posts: 6,862
|
Re: Patterson now available?
Diop for the MLE? We could probably find some free agent who is just as good for the minimum. I'm not particularly impressed by Diop.
|
|
|
12-19-2007, 12:05 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
|
Banned Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 186
|
Re: Patterson now available?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avalanche
If at all possible that would be ideal, im sure we will almost have the pick of whoever we want with the MLE...
Also depends whether we want to keep House
|
They can keep House and Posey from this past mle and get Diop with the mle for the 08 offseason. They gotta spend if they wanna be a great team.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|