Re: Joe Smith, Your Newest Chicago Bull (2 Years, $10 Million)
But he's not a low-post player, he's a jumpshooter! He's Malik Allen+ !
Still, a good signing, veteran guy, can score, rebound.
And as it's only two years, it shouldn't stunt Noah or Tyrus - if they can't deal with having to earn minutes and compete for playing time, they're not Skiles' typa guys anyway.
Apart from Gray, the Bulls are still kinda small though. I know Noah's nearly 7' tall, but he's thin. Ok, on the second unit that doesn't matter, but it's still a fact.
__________________
Life, go easy on me
Quote:
How well is the Knicks Starters vs NBA Team Starters? 60%? 50%? 40%? or are we waiting to see by being optimistic because we have a new additional player in the Starting lineup that we assume Stat sheet record says he is better with this Knick roster than the guy he is replacing?
Re: Joe Smith, Your Newest Chicago Bull (2 Years, $10 Million)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RageofDaBulls
It just shows how badly bulls fans want a low post player..upgrade?sure maybe.but its not like he is going to come in here and turn into KG.theres a reason we got him for 4-5per,remember that..
There is a reason Joe Smith was the #1 overall pick in the deep 95 draft, remember that...
Look I know he isn't a 'low-post' scorer per se, but it's better than Pax sitting on his *** and not doing anything during the summer/FA period.
Besides, who else do you expect, the unsure Chris Mihm??
Re: Joe Smith, Your Newest Chicago Bull (2 Years, $10 Million)
I don't know Joe Smith's game very well but I believe you guys have your reasons to rank him above Chris Mihm, who was my guy to start alongside Big Ben. Thus I am happy for that signing
However if somebody could tell me why Smith > Mihm (assuming he's healthy of course) it would be nice
Re: Joe Smith, Your Newest Chicago Bull (2 Years, $10 Million)
Mihm would've been a better fit, but of course, so would Hawes or Scola....So would a can of soda with great foot work and a consistent hook shot...Let me stop.
Perhaps this "low post threat" isn't as much of a pressing need in Paxson and his minions opinion.
Or perhaps Paxson just didn't want any more white guys...Perhaps Mihms was unreasonably overpriced?
At least SOMETHING was done...But what was addressed?
Re: Joe Smith, Your Newest Chicago Bull (2 Years, $10 Million)
Plus he actually played last year..
basically, if you could guarantee Mihm to be healthy for 70+ games, and that he would play like..whatever that year was when he did well, I'd take Mihm over Smith.
But because you can't guarantee that, Smith was a good choice, considering this year's feeble FA crop of bigmen.
__________________
Life, go easy on me
Quote:
How well is the Knicks Starters vs NBA Team Starters? 60%? 50%? 40%? or are we waiting to see by being optimistic because we have a new additional player in the Starting lineup that we assume Stat sheet record says he is better with this Knick roster than the guy he is replacing?
Re: Joe Smith, Your Newest Chicago Bull (2 Years, $10 Million)
Veteran, under 3 years, he can score in the post (kind of), and hopefully our young bigs can surpass him in playing time (at least in theory). Works for me.
Man, this is the first season I've actually enjoyed Pax's moves (assuming he doesn't do anything drastic). However, he created the problem and let's see if it works itself out.
__________________
The problem can't be defined until the solution is found.
Re: Joe Smith, Your Newest Chicago Bull (2 Years, $10 Million)
That's pretty good news. A nice tradeable contract himself, or a solid guy to have in case we (could) trade Wallace, and a reasonable deal if nobody goes anywhere.
I like his signing more than Noc's signing. I like Noc the player better, of course, but an injury-free 6'10 guy who's not BYC and not overpaid is just what the doctor ordered.
Re: Joe Smith, Your Newest Chicago Bull (2 Years, $10 Million)
Quote:
Originally Posted by different_13
Apart from Gray, the Bulls are still kinda small though. I know Noah's nearly 7' tall, but he's thin. Ok, on the second unit that doesn't matter, but it's still a fact.
Outgoing :
Brown 6'10"
Sweetney 6'8"
Allen 6'10"
Barrett 5'10"
Incoming :
Smith 6'10"
Noah 7'0'
Gray 7'2"
Curry 6'3"
The Bulls will be a bit taller (≈11") next season (not considering Marty, who never played).
Re: Joe Smith, Your Newest Chicago Bull (2 Years, $10 Million)
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeDC
That's pretty good news. A nice tradeable contract himself, or a solid guy to have in case we (could) trade Wallace, and a reasonable deal if nobody goes anywhere.
I don't see this as setting us up to trade Wallace. He is the only real C on the whole roster (except Gray who is a project).
Re: Joe Smith, Your Newest Chicago Bull (2 Years, $10 Million)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thorgal
I don't know Joe Smith's game very well but I believe you guys have your reasons to rank him above Chris Mihm, who was my guy to start alongside Big Ben. Thus I am happy for that signing
However if somebody could tell me why Smith > Mihm (assuming he's healthy of course) it would be nice
Better shooter, better free throw shooter, more athletic, quicker, better defender, better rebounder, more versatile, more veteran experience/leadership (which will help the Bulls tremendously), and since Big Ben and Joe Smith played together at Detroit, they know each other's tendencies and complement each other's game very well.