Thread Tools

Display Modes

casebeck22 · 09-02-2005, 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kamego

Lamond Murray is now out there. Can shoot the 3 a bit. Anyone interested if Delfino doesn't cut it?

Yes. Give me someone that can shoot the lights out from 3 land. The Pistons need it and could have used it last year. Someone please help out Mr. Big Shot out there.

**kamego** · 09-02-2005, 04:04 PM

From NBA.com

Quote:

(September 2, 2005) -- The Toronto Raptors announced Friday they have waived forward Lamond Murray. Murray averaged 6.0 points, 2.7 rebounds and 15.1 minutes in 95 games with Toronto. The 11-year NBA veteran was acquired from Cleveland on August 25, 2002.

**kamego** · 09-02-2005, 04:05 PM

Last season he shot 43.8% from 3 point land. 2 years ago (he's last season as a fulltime starter) he shot 42.4% from 3 point land.

casebeck22 · 09-02-2005, 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kamego

Last season he shot 43.8% from 3 point land. 2 years ago (he's last season as a fulltime starter) he shot 42.4% from 3 point land.

Well the is deffinitly good enough for me. I really feel the need for a strong three point shooter other than our point guard that can give us a boost. I think that would be huge.

**kamego** · 09-02-2005, 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by casebeck22

Well the is deffinitly good enough for me. I really feel the need for a strong three point shooter other than our point guard that can give us a boost. I think that would be huge.

But the most important question is, do you think Lamond would take the vet minimum or LLE?

casebeck22 · 09-02-2005, 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kamego

But the most important question is, do you think Lamond would take the vet minimum or LLE?

I guess he would have to ask himself if he would take a lil pay cut to be on a winning team and be in contention for the title.

**kamego** · 09-02-2005, 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by casebeck22

I guess he would have to ask himself if he would take a lil pay cut to be on a winning team and be in contention for the title.

For the record both the vet min and LLE are higher then zero, his current salary

casebeck22 · 09-02-2005, 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kamego

For the record both the vet min and LLE are higher then zero, his current salary

He could probably sign for more somewhere else though if he wanted. I get what your saying though.

**kamego** · 09-02-2005, 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by casebeck22

He could probably sign for more somewhere else though if he wanted. I get what your saying though.

The good part is not many teams have a lot of spending money left at the moment. He's an 11 year vet who was cut by Toronto so that market isn't going to be wide open for him. Nets fans are saying they could use him for the vet min and not the LLE.

casebeck22 · 09-02-2005, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kamego

The good part is not many teams have a lot of spending money left at the moment. He's an 11 year vet who was cut by Toronto so that market isn't going to be wide open for him. Nets fans are saying they could use him for the vet min and not the LLE.

Yea. Hopefully he would rather come to us than the Nets. Like I said, hopefully he wants to come to a contender.

froggyvk · 09-02-2005, 10:17 PM

We don't have a LLE...

**Austin Kent** · 09-04-2005, 07:14 AM

After watching Lamond Murray in Toronto for the last few years I have two things to say.

-when Lamond Murray gets enough playing time he then, and only then, has a positive attitude and he decides whether or not to play well and actually have an impact on the game.

-why the hell would we want that?

Thread Tools Display Modes

Thread Tools

Display Modes