Thread Tools

Display Modes

STUCKEY! · 05-12-2008, 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deke

im not a homer. a homer would say the bulls are better then the pistons. im just saying i dont like the pistons and your fans typical arrogance is assuming its out of jealousy.

are all opposing rivals secretly jealous?

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Deke · 05-13-2008, 11:46 AM

well 1. my home is not chicago

2. im not delusional. i know the pistons are better, i just dont like them.

3.i am not a homer. i am a realist. a homer bulls fan would make stupid acclimations. all i said is i dont like the pistons. im a hater if anything.

**ChrisWoj** · 05-13-2008, 01:45 PM

I'm sorry, you're not a homer and you're not a hater. You're an insignificant annoyance.

Deke · 05-14-2008, 09:26 AM

then why do you enjoy replying to me so much if im insignificant? do you know what that word means?

**ChrisWoj** · 05-14-2008, 12:28 PM

Because making you look like a fool is absolutely hilarious. Insignificance is all about being trivial, completely unimportant. Which is why its so funny that you never stop talking, you're a silly little kid that enjoys making up things.

You enjoy making up issues. Then when we respond with why we disagree you ask for stats and numbers. And when we come up with stats and numbers you disregard them. You haven't won an argument since you started posting, for no reason, on the Pistons forum. You have a silly little obsession with Detroit, and I find shredding it fun.

Deke · 05-14-2008, 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisWoj

Because making you look like a fool is absolutely hilarious. Insignificance is all about being trivial, completely unimportant. Which is why its so funny that you never stop talking, you're a silly little kid that enjoys making up things.

You enjoy making up issues. Then when we respond with why we disagree you ask for stats and numbers. And when we come up with stats and numbers you disregard them. You haven't won an argument since you started posting, for no reason, on the Pistons forum. You have a silly little obsession with Detroit, and I find shredding it fun.

what have you rebuted? that stuckey doesnt suck? all you did was say "HE SUCKED CUZ OF INJURIES BUT HE HAD A COUPLE GOOD GAMES AT THE END!"

so ****ing what if he had a few good games at the end, he sucked. even a turd shines in the sunlight sometimes.

STUCKEY! · 05-14-2008, 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deke

what have you rebuted? that stuckey doesnt suck? all you did was say "HE SUCKED CUZ OF INJURIES BUT HE HAD A COUPLE GOOD GAMES AT THE END!"

so ****ing what if he had a few good games at the end, he sucked. even a turd shines in the sunlight sometimes.

Why are you watching turds in the first place? thats just gross bro.

**ChrisWoj** · 05-14-2008, 12:55 PM

No, I did not say he sucked because of injuries but he had a couple of good games at the end.

I said he played poorly for his first month-plus as he worked back from an injury and then had two and a half months of good games. There's a big difference between a few games and over two months of games. I'm talking a half of a season's worth of games. From January 29 through April 16 he played very good basketball. He didn't just shine in the sunlight sometimes, he was solid for over two months!

What's your slant on last night, eh? The most important game of his short career and he goes 5/10 from the floor, 5/6 from the line, 6-0 ast-to ratio, and 15 points in 33 minutes against Orlando. Clearly that was just a turd being shined on.

You're hilarious. You have absolutely no argument, but you keep talking! I'm having fun with this, I can go on for months! I should start arguing with you about which direction the sky is in, you'll probably point at your ankle and say "That's a cloud."

Deke · 05-14-2008, 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisWoj

No, I did not say he sucked because of injuries but he had a couple of good games at the end.

I said he played poorly for his first month-plus as he worked back from an injury and then had two and a half months of good games. There's a big difference between a few games and over two months of games. I'm talking a half of a season's worth of games. From January 29 through April 16 he played very good basketball. He didn't just shine in the sunlight sometimes, he was solid for over two months!

What's your slant on last night, eh? The most important game of his short career and he goes 5/10 from the floor, 5/6 from the line, 6-0 ast-to ratio, and 15 points in 33 minutes against Orlando. Clearly that was just a turd being shined on.

You're hilarious. You have absolutely no argument, but you keep talking! I'm having fun with this, I can go on for months! I should start arguing with you about which direction the sky is in, you'll probably point at your ankle and say "That's a cloud."

ok he had injuries but so does everyone else in the nba. ben gordon had injuries but you dont see bulls fans saying he had an amazing season.

for someone whose so amazingly solid right now, hes shooting .400, .188 from 3, and has 1.5 more assists then turnovers.

yeah hes amazing^

**ChrisWoj** · 05-14-2008, 02:32 PM

Do you understand statistics or do you just read the line of numbers and pick and choose at random? During the regular season Stuckey, including his poor play, had a 2.8 to 1.3 assist to turnover number... thats 2-to-1. A 2-to-1 assist to turnover number is generally considered a passable ratio for a starting guard in the NBA. For a rookie it places him as the sixth best in the league. So that means, amongst rookies, Stuckey is in the top 10 percent.

Additionally during the postseason he has a 2.6 assist to turnover ratio.

I really wish you understood statistics, that way you would actually understand what I'm saying. I mean, I already argued the Ben Gordon point:

Quote:

Additionally since you're wondering about Ben Gordon: He wouldn't be a 25ppg scorer no matter what in the system that the Bulls run, but yes you can blame the fact that he wasn't a 20ppg player on his injuries. He sprained his wrist in early February, derailed what was a promising season as the Bulls kept his minutes low to prevent further injury (although he continued to perform at an efficient level).

But clearly you're too ignt to actually comprehend the English language. My prediction is you continue to make a fool of yourself despite my comprehensive destruction of every point you just made. Lets find out how correct I am!

-Chris.

irishfury · 05-14-2008, 07:03 PM

Chris just ignore this tool its pointless to explain anything to him he just a hater.

Stuck is shooting 90% FT in the playoffs. We have won two games without Billups with Stuckey starting. Not to mention we only had 3 TO last games total. A record for fewest turnovers in a NBA playoff game. Quite amazing for a rookie if you asked me. If you look at Billups and Stucks rook numbers they are very very close. So lets just assume this guys a tool and a hater and just ignore him.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisWoj

Do you understand statistics or do you just read the line of numbers and pick and choose at random? During the regular season Stuckey, including his poor play, had a 2.8 to 1.3 assist to turnover number... thats 2-to-1. A 2-to-1 assist to turnover number is generally considered a passable ratio for a starting guard in the NBA. For a rookie it places him as the sixth best in the league. So that means, amongst rookies, Stuckey is in the top 10 percent.

Additionally during the postseason he has a 2.6 assist to turnover ratio.

I really wish you understood statistics, that way you would actually understand what I'm saying. I mean, I already argued the Ben Gordon point:

But clearly you're too ignt to actually comprehend the English language. My prediction is you continue to make a fool of yourself despite my comprehensive destruction of every point you just made. Lets find out how correct I am!

-Chris.

DTigre · 05-14-2008, 07:04 PM

I thought baiting wasn't allowed in the forums?

Deke · 05-14-2008, 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisWoj

Do you understand statistics or do you just read the line of numbers and pick and choose at random? During the regular season Stuckey, including his poor play, had a 2.8 to 1.3 assist to turnover number... thats 2-to-1. A 2-to-1 assist to turnover number is generally considered a passable ratio for a starting guard in the NBA. For a rookie it places him as the sixth best in the league. So that means, amongst rookies, Stuckey is in the top 10 percent.

Additionally during the postseason he has a 2.6 assist to turnover ratio.

I really wish you understood statistics, that way you would actually understand what I'm saying. I mean, I already argued the Ben Gordon point:

But clearly you're too ignt to actually comprehend the English language. My prediction is you continue to make a fool of yourself despite my comprehensive destruction of every point you just made. Lets find out how correct I am!

-Chris.

those stats i posted were PLAYOFF stats since you like talking right now. im sorry but .400 shooting and .188 from 3 is sucking.

Thread Tools Display Modes

Thread Tools

Display Modes