Slasher

TO TORONTO RAPTORS:
Danny Fortson
Erick Dampier
Mike Dunleavy

TO GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS:
Antonio Davis
Morris Peterson
Eric Montross

I think this deal would benefit both teams. First lets start off with the Raptors. First off we would cut off in salery about $1 million. Danny and Erick would bring real toughness and would easily replace the ageing Antonio Davis. With Danny and Erick playing in the west for the last couple of seasons, they would have no problem getting use to the ever weak east frontcourts. Secondly, we do not have the money to resign Morris Peterson, and by trading him we get a good young player who is deadly from the long range and best of all his contract does not expire until 3 years; I am talking about Mike Dunleavy. Mike would be the first real three-point shooter that we have since the departure of Dell Curry and Dee Brown.

Now for the Warriors. By getting Antonio Davis, they can finally have a veteran behind Jaminson. Currently they have youngsters like Murphy, who just won't cut it if this team wants to get to the playoffs. By acquiring Peterson, the Warriors get a complimentary player to Jason Richardson, and an upgrade to Mike Dunleavy. Now, Montross is a gamble for the Warriors, but they have enough front court talent that they can take the gamble. Everyone knows that Montross is injury-prone and nobody knows how he'd match up in the big west coast. But imagine it, if he gets healthy, the Warriors would really get something good here. They would be really big in the frontcourt, but not only that they would have veterans for the first time. Lets face it, the Warriors are a young team, and they need some veterans to step up and help this team to the playoffs; thats exactly what they get in Davis and Montross.

Like I stated earlier, this in my opinion is a win-win for both teams. State your suggestions/opinions below.

Slasher

I am a Raptors fan. Just wanted to get the Warriors' opinions. I think its good for both teams.

INDY

I don't like it. The Warriors add another SG/SF, but they are already stacked at that position. Not to mention that Dunleav has far more potential than Peterson, even if Mikey Jr. is stuck behind Jamison.

Even if the trade was Dampier and Fortson for A.Davis and Montross I wouldn't do it. Damp is a legitimate center, despite being overpaid and Fortson is worth more than Montross, even if he plays only 10 mpg.

A. Davis is a nice player but he is extremely overpaid, injury prone, and old. He is not a guy that will put the Warriors in the playoffs and will probably be out of the league within 2-3 years.

This is a definite no from me as a Warriors fan.

Jason Caffeine

lol yeah you are a Raptors fan, its too one-sided

Slasher

LOL well I am a Raps fan but I think it helps the Warriors out too

KeonBackinTO

Only way this trade happens is if Dunleavy isn't involved.

__________________
Jerome Moiso is the big man the Raptors are looking for!

MightyReds2020

No it doesn't help the Warriors one bit. It actually weakened the C rotation of Foyle/Dampier. You can said what you want but Davis won't cut it as a C in the West. You can also underrated Murphy if you want but if both him and Davis are in Raptors, they will start Murphy over Davis, at PF. Dunleavy is way better than Mo-Pete in terms of potentials. The Warriors might trade Dunleavy, Fortson, Dampier in a package for expiring contracts, but not for worse contracts. At least that is not what I believe.

bigbabyjesus

Not good trade for Warriors, at all

__________________

texan

that trade is horrible for golden state. no way they do that

__________________
its thanksgiving
some people bake pies
and we bake ourselves
-inspiring words from the mind of kelso-