Thread Tools

Display Modes

Pacers Fan · 09-08-2002, 06:57 AM

1. C- B.Miller
PF- JO
SF- Artest
SG- Reggie
PG- Tinsley

2. C- Miller
PF- JO
SF- Big AL
SG- Reggie
PG- Tins

3. C- Foster
PF- Bender
SF- Artest
SG- Mercer
PG- E-Strick

4. same as 3 only with Harrington at SF

5. C- Brezec
PF- C.Rogers
SF- Croshere
SG- Jones
PG- Brewer

okay please name in an 82 game season name how many games we'd win and tell if that's enough to get us into the playoffs and eliminated in how many games with all 5 of those lineups.

here's a J Tins profile

11 Jamaal Tinsley Indiana Pacers
Position: PG
Born: 02/28/78
Height: 6-3 / 1,91
Weight: 195 lbs. / 88,5 kg.
College: Iowa State '01
Nicknamed "The Abuser" on the playgrounds... A Mark Jackson type of player... A very much team oriented point guard... Won't take the shot unless he really has to do it... Poor jumper... Not gifted with physical skills... Reads the game as if he has always been playing in the NBA.
Played college ball at Iowa State University until 1999 and Mount San Jacinto Community College until 2001.
Selected by the Vancouver Grizzlies as 27th overall pick in the 2001 NBA Draft.
Draft rights traded to the Atlanta Hawks and then to the Indiana Pacers, where he is currently playing.
Voted to the NBA All-Rookie 2nd Team in 2001-02.
Named to the Big 12 All-Defensive Team.
Named to the All-NCAA 2nd Team in 2000-01.

**R-Star** · 09-10-2002, 12:00 AM

Lineup 5 would probably be the worst starting lineup in NBA history. I guess our go to guy there is Croshere. Nice. If I had to pick one of those lineups I would pick lineup 2 with Artest being the 6th man comming in and making big stops when it counts and Bender also seeing some nice playing time. I can see that team getting 50 wins. Since Im a totaly biased Pacers fan though, its probably more like 45.

**Petey** · 09-10-2002, 01:27 AM

5 is the weakest for sure.

-Petey

Pacers Fan · 09-10-2002, 05:13 AM

no duh

1. would win 52 games
2. would win 49 games
3. would win 40 games
4. would win 37 games
5. would be better than the Nuggets roster so 5 games

**Petey** · 09-10-2002, 12:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Pacers Fan!
5. would be better than the Nuggets roster so 5 games

You think the Nuggests are gonna win fewer then 5 games honestly?

-Petey

**R-Star** · 09-10-2002, 01:37 PM

Well lets put it this way, they will have the least wins in the L, no question.

Pacers Fan · 09-10-2002, 01:40 PM

OKAY YEAH BUT THE nUGGETS COULD BREAK THE SIXER'S RECORD FOR LEAST GAMES WON IN A SEASON AT 9.

Jermainiac · 09-10-2002, 02:03 PM

4 would suck! I would say that with that lineup though, Croshere would score 30 ppg! He'd b the ONLY scorer.

team wins round 1: round 2: round 3: round 4:

1. 53 3-0 4-2 4-3 1-4
2. 53 3-0 4-2 4-3 1-4
3. 33______________________________
4. 7 ______________________________

I truly think that team 3 would be a damn good team! Not playoff good, but pretty good. All of them have been starters b4. Look @ what their averages would b!

ppg
E-Strick 10 + 5 assists
Mercer: 20
Artest: 12 + 5 boards + 2 steals
Bender: 12 + 5 boards
Foster: 8 + 10 boards

they'd actually b ok!

Pacers Fan · 09-10-2002, 02:05 PM

like i said 37 wins almost in the playoffs. we need artest a lot and that's why we should start him and win 50+ games this year.

**Petey** · 09-10-2002, 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Pacers Fan!
OKAY YEAH BUT THE nUGGETS COULD BREAK THE SIXER'S RECORD FOR LEAST GAMES WON IN A SEASON AT 9.

That is certainly possible... I don't think the nuggets have much, but enough talent to steal more then 5 games for sure.

-Petey

Pacers Fan · 09-10-2002, 05:48 PM

one thing's for sure the cavs and nuggets combined won't equa' 25 wins which is half of what the pacers will get.

Thread Tools Display Modes

Thread Tools

Display Modes