 |
|
11-27-2002, 11:00 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Star
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,831
|
Clippers draft in 2002, what were they thinking
I thought they wasted their 2 picks, and I still do. Unless of course, they are preparing for brand/kandi to leave, so they can rebuild.... again.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
11-27-2002, 11:19 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Fomer Admins are Kewl!
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Living Room Couch
Posts: 15,401
|
Re: Clippers draft in 2002, what were they thinking
Quote:
Originally posted by KennethTo!
I thought they wasted their 2 picks, and I still do. Unless of course, they are preparing for brand/kandi to leave, so they can rebuild.... again.
|
They know that Kandi is out of here so that is why they drafted ELY. As for Wilcox. I have no idea
__________________
I have no clue!
|
|
|
11-27-2002, 11:40 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Player
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 756
Rep Power: 6
|
the biggest mistakes are the trades, not drafts.
Why do clippers get Brand and Miller considering on the budget and the luxury tax?
|
|
|
11-27-2002, 11:52 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Fomer Admins are Kewl!
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Living Room Couch
Posts: 15,401
|
Quote:
Originally posted by FatDaddy!
the biggest mistakes are the trades, not drafts.
Why do clippers get Brand and Miller considering on the budget and the luxury tax?
|
because they didnt make the strides they did until last year when Brand got there. IF it wasnt for him last years team would have fallen apart. Miller is the best young PG in the league. There goes your answer
__________________
I have no clue!
|
|
|
11-27-2002, 12:02 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Player
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 756
Rep Power: 6
|
tell me the Clips long term plan considering on business.
|
|
|
11-27-2002, 12:20 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Fomer Admins are Kewl!
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Living Room Couch
Posts: 15,401
|
Quote:
Originally posted by FatDaddy!
tell me the Clips long term plan considering on business.
|
How do you or anyone else know that doesnt work in the Clippers front office?
__________________
I have no clue!
|
|
|
11-27-2002, 01:14 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Player
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 756
Rep Power: 6
|
it doesn't work is the best answer.
|
|
|
11-27-2002, 01:25 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Fomer Admins are Kewl!
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Living Room Couch
Posts: 15,401
|
Quote:
Originally posted by FatDaddy!
it doesn't work is the best answer.
|
WHAT????? 
__________________
I have no clue!
|
|
|
11-27-2002, 01:32 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: CANADA
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 7
|
Andre Miller is OVERRATED. He shoots too much, cant shoot worth crap from long range and isnt proving to be a very good leader. He got too much hype this summer, although it appears Miles was overhyped too. Miller is decent, thats all. As far as being the best young pg in the league, LOL! Have u ever heard of a few ppl by the names Stephon Marbury, Baron Davis, Steve Nash, Mike Bibby, hell id even consider Arenas before him.
__________________
Ball til u fall
|
|
|
11-27-2002, 01:47 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Fomer Admins are Kewl!
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Living Room Couch
Posts: 15,401
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Joe_Canada!
Andre Miller is OVERRATED. He shoots too much, cant shoot worth crap from long range and isnt proving to be a very good leader. He got too much hype this summer, although it appears Miles was overhyped too. Miller is decent, thats all. As far as being the best young pg in the league, LOL! Have u ever heard of a few ppl by the names Stephon Marbury, Baron Davis, Steve Nash, Mike Bibby, hell id even consider Arenas before him.
|
Firstly he is not overrated. He does not shoot that much. SO your statement looses validity right there. He lead the league in assists with the worst team in the league last year and he was overhyped. Stephon Marbury does not have the PG skills that he has. Nash isnt young anymore so I will group him with Marbury. Baron Davis is arguable hes a better floor general and passer than Bibby will ever be and Arenas is no where near as good as him
__________________
I have no clue!
|
|
|
11-27-2002, 01:54 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: CANADA
Posts: 81
Rep Power: 7
|
hes averaging 7.3 assists this year, which is why i say hes overrated. And Nash is just 2 years older. Arenas is younger and is putting up very comparable numbers with better shooting percentages. Marbury is putting up better assist numbers on a better team, which i would say is being a better point guard. Marbury's pg skills have always been underrated. And he almost has the most shots on the team, which i would say is shooting a little too much considering he cant really shoot worth anything from anything outside 15 feet. And Bibby's numbers are hindered a little by the style the kings play and all the scorers and people who can handle the ball on their team. Id still take Bibby over Miller, but that one admittedly is debatable. One things for sure, no way this guys worth the max money he was asking for. Not even close.
__________________
Ball til u fall
|
|
|
11-27-2002, 02:02 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Player
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 756
Rep Power: 6
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Joe_Canada!
hes averaging 7.3 assists this year, which is why i say hes overrated. And Nash is just 2 years older. Arenas is younger and is putting up very comparable numbers with better shooting percentages. Marbury is putting up better assist numbers on a better team, which i would say is being a better point guard. Marbury's pg skills have always been underrated. And he almost has the most shots on the team, which i would say is shooting a little too much considering he cant really shoot worth anything from anything outside 15 feet. And Bibby's numbers are hindered a little by the style the kings play and all the scorers and people who can handle the ball on their team. Id still take Bibby over Miller, but that one admittedly is debatable. One things for sure, no way this guys worth the max money he was asking for. Not even close.
|
I agree with you. I always say:
Nash is better than Miller.
Bradley is better than Olowokandi.
Dirk is better than Brand.
|
|
|
11-27-2002, 02:06 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Player
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 756
Rep Power: 6
|
Re: Clippers draft in 2002, what were they thinking
Quote:
Originally posted by KennethTo!
I thought they wasted their 2 picks, and I still do. Unless of course, they are preparing for brand/kandi to leave, so they can rebuild.... again.
|
I agree. they really need to rebuild.
|
|
|
11-28-2002, 05:22 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Kwisatz Haderach
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Coatesville, PA
Age: 25
Posts: 24,093
|
The picks weren't a waste, because Donald Sterling really never wanted to use the money needed to sign Elton Brand and Michael Olowakandi, so in the future expect to see Ely starting at center, and Chris Wilcox starting at PF.
They got rid of Darius Miles because he had more years on his contract than Andre Miller. Right now Dre is a merc playing for whatever contract he can get in the off season, as is Kandi. The question is whether they'll give Elton Brand a qualifying offer to keep him for the last year of his contract. While a few weeks ago, I believed Lamar Odom would be the guy they kept, I'm pretty sure he's out the door without a doubt, too injury prone, but it all depends on how cheap he comes.
What's sad about the Clippers (even though I'm not a Dre Miller fan), is that they have talent, and they showed last year that they can play, but now without the commitment from the top they'll be disbanded, I guess we can look at it in years to come and treat it like the players "graduated" from the Clippers.
Look forward to the lineup of for next season:
PG: Jaric
SG: Dooling
SF: Richardson
PF: Wilcox
C: Ely
That is unless something outrageous happens in regards of trades. Maggette should get a considerable look in free agency, and since the Clips can't give everyone an offer for that year, look for a lot of people to leave. And with whomever they get in the draft next year, you can be happy.. because you know that the Clips will still be one of the younger teams in the league.
-Tim
|
|
|
11-28-2002, 05:47 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Player
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Age: 33
Posts: 513
Rep Power: 6
|
I know that teams should be able to play through injuries because every team has to deal with it, but the way a lot of people have been jumping off and on the Clippers bandwagon is ridiculous. Near the end of the summer, all people were talking about was how good the Clips were going to be. How they were going to make the playoffs, and push some of the top teams, etc. And now people are talking about rebuilding, just 3 months later? Settle down. Keep in mind that they haven't played much with two of their better players in Odom and Q. Despite the fact that they should be doing better than they are, those are pretty big losses.
And we also shouldn't really be judging a guy like Wilcox who came out as a sophomore and hasn't had a chance to do anything yet. Just take a breath everyone. Let's not write everyone off just yet.
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|