![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EightZeroFive
Age: 23
Posts: 23,363
Rep Power: 11947859
|
What if the triangle had a great PG?
I was thinking about this. What would be different? It's often said you don't NEED one, but what if you had one?
__________________
Only losing can make you terrible
LOSE METHOD |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
All-Star
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 5,673
Rep Power: 3274359
|
Re: What if the triangle had a great PG?
he'd be under-utilized? it really depends on what kind of great PG we're talking about - Magic Johnson in the triple post could probably thrive - Jon Stockton on the other hand would be wasted
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Star
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,573
Rep Power: 1038197
|
Re: What if the triangle had a great PG?
If PG was one of our stronger positions, you would just see the triangle revolve around them more. The PG would be running off the screen by the man in the pinch post (very high post) instead of the SG or SF that does it currently. He would be passing from the heart of the defense instead of the perimeter, and hopefully draining mid range shots when open.
The triangle gets penetration through passing, instead of one quick guard breaking off his man. It also aims to have everyone engaged in every play, and to have most players touch the ball, instead of the PG dominated drive and kick you see on a lot of other teams. So just because a greta PG is not needed in the triangle, doesnt mean that the triangle wouldnt work for a team with a great PG. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Go Dawgs
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,898
Rep Power: 4300832
|
Re: What if the triangle had a great PG?
It would definiatly alter our offense and unless we're talking about a superstar type player I can't see them thriving. Obviously having Deron Williams or Chris Paul would make us a (much) better team, but it wouldn't be the 20/10 players that we've become accustomed to watching.
Then again, if we did get a hold of that kind of falicitator we would most likely stop running the triangle all toghether and run an offense that would benefit our new found playmakers.
__________________
Formerly VanillaPrice |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Star
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,974
Rep Power: 1038152
|
Re: What if the triangle had a great PG?
Quote:
And of course a great point guard could work. I don't understand why people think it is a bad thing to have somebody who could take the pressure off Kobe and set him up for easy baskets.
__________________
"We've learned Kobe Bryant has been asked to run the Federal Reserve. The feeling is, he can do more with three quarters than most of us can do with a whole dollar." --Peter Vescey, NY Post |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Riverside, California
Age: 29
Posts: 9,578
Rep Power: 7193604
|
Re: What if the triangle had a great PG?
Having a great PG on our team would only make us that much more versatile in terms of the way we can attack other teams offensively.
__________________
![]() Rumble, young man, rumble... |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: EightZeroFive
Age: 23
Posts: 23,363
Rep Power: 11947859
|
Re: What if the triangle had a great PG?
...so. Will we see it?
__________________
Only losing can make you terrible
LOSE METHOD |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
First Round Draft Pick
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,092
Rep Power: 163097
|
Re: What if the triangle had a great PG?
If the triangle offense would be run full-time then Nash would definitely still be restricted as the ball wouldn't always be in his hands.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|