![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#61 (permalink) | |
|
The Original Paul George
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The village of Clive, bro
Age: 30
Posts: 38,365
Rep Power: 21474886
|
Re: UPDATE: With Nash agreement, Sessions is off the board
Quote:
And how would he have mattered more playing backup to Nash? Nice try? No. Just pointing out you're kind of a homer like I previously stated.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#62 (permalink) | |
|
Go Dawgs
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 12,229
Rep Power: 4590431
|
Re: UPDATE: With Nash agreement, Sessions is off the board
Quote:
Yes he would have mattered playing behind Nash. He would have actually been playing for something. HIs presence on the basketball court would have actually mattered in the grand scheme of things. Same if he backed up Westbrook in OKC. Or Paul on the Clippers. Or ****, even George Hill in Indiana. But he's not going to matter in Charlotte. Nobody is going to give a shit about Ramon Sessions. So yeah. Good try. I'm still waiting for a real example of my homerisms, by the way.
__________________
Formerly VanillaPrice |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 (permalink) | |
|
The Original Paul George
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The village of Clive, bro
Age: 30
Posts: 38,365
Rep Power: 21474886
|
Re: UPDATE: With Nash agreement, Sessions is off the board
Quote:
Other examples are just when you talk about the Lakers in general around the forum. Kobe in general. That's the impression you've left. If you don't agree that's fine, but it doesn't change that that's the impression you're leaving.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 (permalink) | |
|
Go Dawgs
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 12,229
Rep Power: 4590431
|
Re: UPDATE: With Nash agreement, Sessions is off the board
Quote:
Show me the last outlandish post I made about the Lakers and Kobe specifically. I haven't said that the Lakers were the favorites all year, and I stand by my evaluation of Kobe. He's the best shooting guard in the world and a top ten player ever. Nothing more, nothing less. Feel free to try and debate me. You're talking about me leaving impressions without citing specific examples of me coming off as a homer. I'd stop while I was behind if I were you.
__________________
Formerly VanillaPrice |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 (permalink) | |
|
The Original Paul George
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The village of Clive, bro
Age: 30
Posts: 38,365
Rep Power: 21474886
|
Re: UPDATE: With Nash agreement, Sessions is off the board
Quote:
I've stated the impression you give off. I'm not searching posts to help explain to you the impression you give. Read your own posts while you write them if you'd like. I don't want to derail this thread. If you want to discuss it in another thread have at it.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#66 (permalink) | |
|
Go Dawgs
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 12,229
Rep Power: 4590431
|
Re: UPDATE: With Nash agreement, Sessions is off the board
Quote:
What is the consensus about Nash/Pau? Will they be able to flourish? Will Steve's playmaking ability help find Gasol in the spots where he's more effective? Will Pau become more consistently effective now that he's got a real threat from deep?
__________________
Formerly VanillaPrice |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 (permalink) |
|
The Original Paul George
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The village of Clive, bro
Age: 30
Posts: 38,365
Rep Power: 21474886
|
Re: UPDATE: With Nash agreement, Sessions is off the board
Pathetic. And if you don't want a reply post like that in the future, don't try to bait with some amateur hour child move.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#68 (permalink) |
|
Beware of Elbows
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 18,376
Rep Power: 2271099
|
Re: UPDATE: With Nash agreement, Sessions is off the board
You get into way too many arguments on the Internet.
__________________
Chick Hearn: This game is in the refrigerator. The door is closed, the lights are out, the eggs are gettin' cool, the butter's gettin' hard, and the jellooooooo's jigglin'! |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 (permalink) |
|
KING OF THE INTERWEBZ!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Watching the Lakers
Age: 96
Posts: 20,403
Rep Power: 14080269
|
Re: UPDATE: With Nash agreement, Sessions is off the board
Glad Sessions can get paid. He should strive to be that team's best player next year.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 (permalink) | |
|
The Original Paul George
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The village of Clive, bro
Age: 30
Posts: 38,365
Rep Power: 21474886
|
Re: UPDATE: With Nash agreement, Sessions is off the board
Quote:
Him and MKG make a decent young back court though. Will be interesting to watch.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 (permalink) |
|
The Original Paul George
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The village of Clive, bro
Age: 30
Posts: 38,365
Rep Power: 21474886
|
Re: UPDATE: With Nash agreement, Sessions is off the board
Meh. He's not old either but yea, I guess 27 doesn't really qualify as young at all when it comes to basketball.
I thought he was a couple years younger for some reason.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 (permalink) |
|
Go Dawgs
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 12,229
Rep Power: 4590431
|
Re: UPDATE: With Nash agreement, Sessions is off the board
I thought he was too before this season. I feel like it was yesterday that he had that 20+ assist game in Milwaukee as a rookie (sophomore?)
__________________
Formerly VanillaPrice |
|
|
|
|
|
#75 (permalink) |
|
The Original Paul George
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The village of Clive, bro
Age: 30
Posts: 38,365
Rep Power: 21474886
|
Re: UPDATE: With Nash agreement, Sessions is off the board
I always seem to think point guards around his age are younger than they really are. Not sure why.
__________________
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|