![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#52 (permalink) |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,106
Rep Power: 143574
|
Re: Game #36: Thunder (27-8) @ Lakers (15-20)
Lol...Not making the playoffs unless Steve Blake comes back firing on all cylinders and Earl Clark performs like this every night; or unless Dwight miraculously turns back into a DPOY.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 (permalink) |
|
Site Founder
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Brea, California
Posts: 14,565
Rep Power: 2734398
|
Re: Game #36: Thunder (27-8) @ Lakers (15-20)
I've predicted 5-5 for the next 10 games on this thread and it could be better, but they just have to get serious on defense. I haven't seen much defensive effort in this game tonight, however.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 (permalink) |
|
Site Founder
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Brea, California
Posts: 14,565
Rep Power: 2734398
|
Re: Game #36: Thunder (27-8) @ Lakers (15-20)
2nd half comebacks this year...
Down by 18 to Charlotte comeback for a win. Down by 19 to Clippers (4Q) and got to within 2 as I recall. Down by 16 to San Antonio (4Q) and got to within 2. Report others, these are just the ones that come to my mind. Not saying it will happen tonight, but they have the capability...one must ask, however, why do we need to get so far down before we get serious about the game? |
|
|
|
|
|
#57 (permalink) |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Montana
Posts: 1,106
Rep Power: 143574
|
Re: Game #36: Thunder (27-8) @ Lakers (15-20)
I don't buy-in to PER much, but it's telling that the Lakers only have 3 players over 15 PER.
The Timberwolves only have 1 player under 10 PER, with most of them being 12+. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|