![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#122 (permalink) | |
|
Player
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 704
Rep Power: 112737
|
Quote:
A.C. Green, Mychal Thompson, and James Worthy dominated the PF spot in the latter half of the 80's. Rambis started I think one year. He was a heck of a rebounder and defender. Unlike the foul a minute Madsen. The guy is out of control most of the time. Are you telling me that a trapping lineup of PG Cooper SG Magic SF A.C. Green PF James Worthy C Mychal Thompson wouldn't trap the current Lakers into oblivion? They have a hard time crossing halfcourt against the Warriors. Kobe ends up playing the point and there is no way he can sustain that level of energy for 48 minutes. 80's Lakers had depth, the current Lakers have none. I can't believe a fellow Laker fan can't see that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#123 (permalink) |
|
X-Mas Taker
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: nyc
Posts: 8,387
Rep Power: 2256496
|
buduan,
if you really watched the lakers in the 80's you would have known worthy was a small forward
power wasn't really his thing, he relied mostly on a dymamite 1st step and quickness more often then not ...the guy never avg. more than 6 boards a game and ac green & rambis did not dominate the power forward spot ...not even close and despite what you like to think i did watch basketball in the 80s
__________________
Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb deciding what to eat for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote. |
|
|
|
|
|
#124 (permalink) | |
|
Player
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 704
Rep Power: 112737
|
Re: buduan,
Quote:
If you watched like you claim you would know that Worthy played the PF position quite a bit. Especially with that trapping unit I posted. They had Green as the SF with that lineup. Don't you remember Worthy guarding McHale in all those Finals? Isn't McHale a PF? One of the greatest if I remember correctly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#125 (permalink) |
|
Star
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,676
Rep Power: 78445
|
The Laker team today cannot beat a Laker team in the mid to early 80s with a still good Jabbar. Take the 99-00 Laker team when they won 67-15. That was the deepest Laker team out of their 3 championships.
C Shaq (29.7 ppg, 13.6 rpg, 3.8 apg) MVP PF Green (5 ppg, 5.9 rpg) SF Rice (15.9 ppg, 4.1 rpg) SG Kobe (22.5 ppg, 6.3 rpg, 4.9 apg) PG Harper (7 ppg, 3.4 apg) * Fisher * Horry * Fox * Lue * Shaw * Salley * George Compare that to 86-87 arguably the greatest and deepest Laker team in the 80s. C Kareem (17.5 ppg, 6.7 rpg) PF Green (10.8 ppg, 7.8 rpg) SF Worthy (19.4 ppg, 5.7 rpg, 2.8 apg) SG Scott (17 ppg, 3.4 apg) PG Magic (23.9 ppg, 6.3 rpg, 12.2 apg) * Thompson (11.4 ppg) * Cooper (10.5 ppg) * Rambis (5.7 ppg, 5.8 rpg) * Billy Thompson * Branch * Matthews * Brickowski The depth of the 86-87 Lakers would be too much for the 99-00 Lakers. The Lakers today even with a dominant Kobe would lose against any Laker's team in the 80s (early to mid) 8 times out of 10 simply because of the Laker's incredible depth. Kareem, Magic, Worthy, Scott, Wilkes (early 80s), and Nixon (early 80's) were all good for 20 ppg. I have never witnessed a more balance team than the Lakers in the 80s. Celtics come second...their starting lineup was incredible. The best chemistry team I have ever seen were the 72-10 Bulls and the 69-13 Bulls. Of course I never saw Russell's Celtics...that could actually be the best team of alltime. |
|
|
|
|
|
#126 (permalink) | |
|
Star
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,676
Rep Power: 78445
|
Re: Re: buduan,
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#127 (permalink) | |
|
X-Mas Taker
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: nyc
Posts: 8,387
Rep Power: 2256496
|
Re: Re: buduan,
Quote:
did that make him a point guard? magic almost never guarded opposing point guards yet he is considered one of the best all time at that position if the best you can do is one match-up when the majority of the time it didn't happen like that, you just lost this argument
__________________
Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb deciding what to eat for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#128 (permalink) | |
|
Star
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,676
Rep Power: 78445
|
Re: Re: Re: buduan,
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#129 (permalink) |
|
X-Mas Taker
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: nyc
Posts: 8,387
Rep Power: 2256496
|
also the majority of the time
on the celtics side of things
mchale guarded small forwards and bird guarded power forwards when they were on the floor together did this make bird a power forward and mchale a small forward? other examples when the lakers faced the bulls(starting in their finals meeting) pippen usually guarded magic and MJ stayed on worthy by your logic buduan, with worthy being a power forward and air jordan guarding him, it now makes michael jordan a 4 ive seen dennis rodman guard shaq , and shaq guard rodman so by your logic either rodman is a center(which makes luc longley a forward) or shaq is a forward matchups are one thing but when you use your eyes its another ac green was the power forward he did the dirty work of setting picks and grabbing the rebounds worthy stayed out on the perimeter (although he did post up here and there throughout a game) and though worthy and green were about the same size it was obvious that both had very different roles on the team and because they were about the same size it allowed for flexibilty in certain matchups but worthy was the small forward
__________________
Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb deciding what to eat for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote. |
|
|
|
|
|
#130 (permalink) | |
|
X-Mas Taker
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: nyc
Posts: 8,387
Rep Power: 2256496
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: buduan,
Quote:
__________________
Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb deciding what to eat for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#131 (permalink) | |
|
Star
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,676
Rep Power: 78445
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: buduan,
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#132 (permalink) | |
|
X-Mas Taker
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: nyc
Posts: 8,387
Rep Power: 2256496
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: buduan,
Quote:
A.C. Green, Mychal Thompson, and James Worthy dominated the PF spot in the latter half of the 80's. Rambis started I think one year. He was a heck of a rebounder and defender. Unlike the foul a minute Madsen. The guy is out of control most of the time.-buduan there was nothing about being a part timer(and spending most of the time in another positionit was about how the line-up with worthy at the 4 dominated )) and the statement was incredibly untrue the bulls had a great trap in the early 90s in which horace grant played a guard role by his duties in the trap in the backcourt that didn't make grant a guard because in the halfcourt game just like worthy he went back to his normal role and though worthy and green were about the same size it was obvious that both had very different roles on the team and because they were about the same size it allowed for flexibilty in certain matchups but worthy was the small forward-this is me earlier i acknowledged that on occasion they switched up ..but you are what you are, ac green wasn't about to be trying to take players off the dribble while worthy played on the weakside trying to garner rebounds off misses and thats why worthy is a 3 and green is a 4 ...its because of their offensive purpose on the floor and that never changed not while they were trapping not while they were playing the clippers or celtics or whomever
__________________
Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb deciding what to eat for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#133 (permalink) | |
|
Star
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,676
Rep Power: 78445
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: buduan,
Quote:
A.C. Green, Mychal Thompson, and James Worthy dominated the PF spot in the latter half of the 80's< This is wrong. Barkley, Malone, and McHale were the most dominating 4s in the latter half of the 80s. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|