If he broke his contract, then he'd be accepting a buyout of $0. Meaning that he'd no longer be on our team, or cap, and we'd owe him nothing. He wouldn't have to be traded to the Celtics for Perk. He could just sign there on his own. And yes, that would be very interesting.
If he broke his contract, then he'd be accepting a buyout of $0. Meaning that he'd no longer be on our team, or cap, and we'd owe him nothing. He wouldn't have to be traded to the Celtics for Perk. He could just sign there on his own. And yes, that would be very interesting.
If he broke his contract, then he'd be accepting a buyout of $0. Meaning that he'd no longer be on our team, or cap, and we'd owe him nothing. He wouldn't have to be traded to the Celtics for Perk. He could just sign there on his own. And yes, that would be very interesting.
I can only think of one time in the history of the NBA when both the player and the team agreed to let a guy just end his contract and leave: Derek Fisher leaving Utah. It's hard to imagine Shaq thinking it's in his best interest to give up more than $40 million to go play for the veteran's minimum on a team where he'd be the fourth option, championship or not.