[bronx43]

Originally Posted by mqtcelticsfan

Yep, and you now are that much closer to winning your division, and should be happy your team won. That doesn't make the win impressive, because without KG, it's not. Glen Davis, while not an amazing player, provides depth at a weak spot for the Cs. We started Scalabrine today. Your team needed a buzzer beater to beat us, and we did not have our best player, and our best backup big man.

Guy, just let the kid have his emotionally masturbatory thread. Only playoff wins against a singular team matter.

[myst]

Can we also make a thread when your team loses 3 times in a week?

This should be discussed in the Magic forum, unless you actually expected people to come in here and kiss your ***.

[Idunkonyou]

Originally Posted by bronx43

Idunkonyou cares. Alot.

Are the Magic still in a downfall?

10 games over .500 this year compared to only 2 games over .500 last year in the first 46 games, plus they have 17 wins on the road already this year compared to only 16 for the entire season last year.

I like the improvement.

[Idunkonyou]

Originally Posted by myst

Can we also make a thread when your team loses 3 times in a week?

This should be discussed in the Magic forum, unless you actually expected people to come in here and kiss your ***.

I doubt you guys could kiss my *** as much as Heat fans kiss Wade's. Now go back to the Heat board and talk about the lottery.

[Duck34234]

Originally Posted by myst

Can we also make a thread when your team loses 3 times in a week?

This should be discussed in the Magic forum, unless you actually expected people to come in here and kiss your ***.

Oh yes, you're quite right. The NBA forum should be solely used to discuss teams with 15 game losing streaks. My bad.

What's interesting is that I doubt anyone of you cared about a Celtics/Magic basketball game before this season. Or ..watched one. Being a long time Magic fan, I've taken particular interest in Magic/Celtic games because of Doc Rivers. I was actually kind of scared to learn that KG wouldn't be playing for the C's today. I knew it would mean that instead of running their offense through Garnett, Pierce would be responsible for shouldering more of the load on offense. The ball in his hands more. Garnett's play can be neutralized fairly well with Howard's defense, but the fact remains that there is no one on this Magic team that can slow Paul Pierce on an individual basis. It was the reason why he was allowed to drop 20 points on us in the first half.

[Duck34234]

If you're interested, look up the Magic's winning percentage in the past years when facing Boston. And then look at how many points Pierce scored in those victories -- especially how many FT attempts he had.

[Duck34234]

Originally Posted by bronx43

Guy, just let the kid have his emotionally masturbatory thread. Only playoff wins against a singular team matter.

Readdddd to achieveeee! There are not one but three] playoff teams in the thread title.

[Idunkonyou]

Originally Posted by mqtcelticsfan

And if you think the Cs aren't better with KG in there instead of Scalabrine, you're the single stupidest ****ing person ever.

On the court stats don't lie:

1st two games:

KG, Davis and Posey stats vs. the Magic - 19 points, 14.5 rebounds, 4.5 assists, 2.5 blocks

Today's game:

Posey, Scalabrine and Powe today vs the Magic - 26 points, 16 rebounds, 1 assist

Also have fun being banned for name calling.

[HB]

I find it hard to believe that Idunkonyou is in his 30s

[mqtcelticsfan]

Originally Posted by Duck34234

Readdddd to achieveeee! There are not one but three] playoff teams in the thread title.

Learn reading comprehension. His point was that playoff wins are what count, and even if you win a game against three different playoff teams, it doesn't matter unless you beat each team in a series.