![]() ![]() |
![]() |
| View Poll Results: Which group (barring all unfortunate outcomes) would've achieved the most? | |||
| Grant Hill & T-Mac |
|
2 | 11.11% |
| Garnett & Marbury |
|
3 | 16.67% |
| VC & T-Mac |
|
3 | 16.67% |
| Lebron & Boozer |
|
1 | 5.56% |
| Dirk & Nash |
|
1 | 5.56% |
| T-Mac & Yao |
|
3 | 16.67% |
| Barkley, Olajuwon, Drexler |
|
2 | 11.11% |
| Jermaine O'Neal & Chris Bosh |
|
0 | 0% |
| Stackhouse & Hill |
|
0 | 0% |
| Roy & Aldridge |
|
0 | 0% |
| VC & Hakeem |
|
0 | 0% |
| The 2002 Kings |
|
0 | 0% |
| Love & Rubio |
|
0 | 0% |
| Bryant/Howard/Nash |
|
2 | 11.11% |
| Other |
|
1 | 5.56% |
| Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
Star
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,500
Rep Power: 431975
|
Re: Which group would've been the best?
Given that I am a Cavs fan and that I was one of the people pissed off to beyond belief when Boozer left Cleveland because I saw the potential he had after averaging a double double the year he played with Lebron, I had to go with Lebron/Boozer. One of the major reasons as to why Lebron could never win a title in Cleveland was that he was the only person on the team who could do a consistent amount of damage to teams on a per game basis in the playoffs. Boozer being with Lebron not only would've given Lebron a big boost, but also Boozer as well. And if Boozer had an off night, he could still contribute very well with his rebounding.
Lebron would've definitely won if Boozer had stayed, but of course Boozer booted Cleveland out of his options list and left because...idk it's ****ing Cleveland. So with that I say **** YOU CARLOS BOOZER AND **** YOUR UGLY FACE YOU WORTHLESS ****!
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Star
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,500
Rep Power: 431975
|
Re: Which group would've been the best?
Also do you think Paul/Kobe should be added to this list since technically they were going to be teammates at one point?
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
X V I
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Miami/Raleigh
Age: 27
Posts: 16,224
Rep Power: 2677068
|
Re: Which group would've been the best?
^I don't think so. They never were actually teammates. I'm fine with guys who never hit the court together on it, but at least have them actually having been on the same team officially.
Wish I could change my vote to LBJ/Booz. Boozer's Boozerness just skewed my vision for a moment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
BBB.net Archivist
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The village of Clive, bro
Age: 30
Posts: 37,978
Rep Power: 21474884
|
Re: Which group would've been the best?
Vince and TMac. If they were both together hitting their primes, it would have been sick.
Close second to TMac and Hill.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
BBB.net Archivist
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The village of Clive, bro
Age: 30
Posts: 37,978
Rep Power: 21474884
|
Re: Which group would've been the best?
Vince and Hakeem is the best. I hope its not an "in their primes" and just "if things had worked out better", because Hakeem could hardly walk when he went to the Raptors. It was a train wreck.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) | ||
|
Star
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Age: 23
Posts: 4,414
Rep Power: 59569
|
Re: Which group would've been the best?
Quote:
Quote:
I wonder how Roy and Oden would've turned out. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) |
|
BBB.net Archivist
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The village of Clive, bro
Age: 30
Posts: 37,978
Rep Power: 21474884
|
Re: Which group would've been the best?
If we're going on untapped potential, Brand, Odom, Miles and QRich was one I always watched and waited to blossom. Hell, even throw in The Kandiman.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 (permalink) | |
|
6th Man
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 283
Rep Power: 338927
|
Re: Which group would've been the best?
Quote:
Wow dude you gotta get out of that place. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) | |
|
Star
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,500
Rep Power: 431975
|
Re: Which group would've been the best?
Why should they be in this list? They didn't get screwed over by injuries or anything they just got flat out destroyed by the Pistons.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) | |
|
Star
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,500
Rep Power: 431975
|
Re: Which group would've been the best?
NOT Ohio itself, but the city of Cleveland. Plus Utah offered a better contract than Cleveland did, Boozer just simply gave Cleveland the middle finger after saying he would commit at first.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|