Which group would've been the best?

[Mattsanity]

T-Mac's confession at 3:20 gets me weepy-eyed.

[Dee-Zy]

That vid gets me thinking.

Had that team stayed together, they probably would of been to the ECF almost every year for the next 3-4 years right? Maybe 2 finals appearance? Would they have a shot at winning a ring after the Shaq/Kobe Dynasty or they would of lost to the spurs anyway?

[seifer0406]

KG/Marbury. Marbury leaving Minnesota ruined his career and almost ruined KG's championship dreams as well. Had Steph been less crazy those two could've competed with the Spurs/Lakers for championships.

[Dee-Zy]

I hear that a lot, I don't see Starbury being good enough to challenge 2 of the biggest dynasties of the 2000s.

If Starbury is the 2nd best player on the team, I don't see how he can challenge a Kobe/Shaq or Duncan/Parker, Duncan/DRob

[seifer0406]

Originally Posted by Dee-Zy

I hear that a lot, I don't see Starbury being good enough to challenge 2 of the biggest dynasties of the 2000s.

If Starbury is the 2nd best player on the team, I don't see how he can challenge a Kobe/Shaq or Duncan/Parker, Duncan/DRob

Marbury in his prime was a better player than Tony Parker or at least had way more talent than Parker. We would never know for sure since Marbury became the #1 guy after he left Minnesota. Had he stayed and played second fiddle to KG it's hard to say whether he could've become a better point guard. As a scorer I would take a prime Marbury or Parker any day.

That Twolves team also had Tom Gugliotta who was a 20/9 guy himself. Had the 3 of them played together for a few more years it could've been special.

[e-monk]

gugliotta! you tickle me, another good argument as to how watered down the 90s were....