![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Player
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: College Station, Texas
Posts: 697
Rep Power: 10
|
I think Shaq is a better player. I would even put Kareem Abdul-Jabbar in front of Wilt. Basketball has changed alot since when Wilt played. Wilt could put up 25ppg and 10rpg in todays game.
__________________
The Dynasty is just getting started in H-Town. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,311
Rep Power: 24
|
Wilt's 50/25 season would be 30/15 today, considered that teams take fewer shots and there are fewer rebounds to grab in today's game. Further Wilt wouldn't be able to dominate with his physics today as much as he was able to in the 60s. Nowadays centers are usually 7 ft, while they were about 6-10 in the 60s.
__________________
The next thing you know someone will report that Wes Unseld and Gale Sayers were spotted buying one of Ol' LeBron's St. Vincent-St. Mary throwback jerseys. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
All-Star
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,527
Rep Power: 5748101
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Banned Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wherever the AirForce sends me
Age: 31
Posts: 420
Rep Power: 0
|
Shaq
When Wilt played there was no such thing as 3 seconds in the key. Can you imagine shaq playing with no 3 second call? He would average 50 points and 50 rebounds too. Wilt in todays game is like Todays shaq.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Home where I wanted to go
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: CA for now but my heart will always be in Jersey.
Age: 32
Posts: 9,846
Rep Power: 3037443
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
All-Star
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Tokyo
Age: 27
Posts: 6,651
Rep Power: 5798319
|
I'd put Wilt at about 20/10... obviously the game has evolved and there are bigger centers and stuff. Who knows how he would've played if there was 3 in the key? And how does he match up against the better post defenders of recent times? I mean, Hakeem would've owned him...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
All-Star
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Age: 29
Posts: 5,637
Rep Power: 5745
|
I'm only 12 and I've never seen Wilt play, but I heard on ESPN that Wilt Chemberlon played against a bunch of short fat white guys. Well in the NBA today there aren't any short fat white guys, so I rekon Wilt wouldn't even be good enough to make an NBA roster.
__________________
If they think we're going into the stands again, then they have the I.Q. of a rabbit. - Stephen Jackson |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
All-Star
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,527
Rep Power: 5748101
|
they had the 3 second rule with wilt. what wilt caused them to do was widen the lane from 12 feet to 16 feet. he was still the most dominant rebounder in the league. to think he wouldn't be dominant today, or moreso be a dominant rebounder, is ridiculous. he was still a dominant rebounder in the 70s when he had lost some of his athleticism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
All-Star
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,527
Rep Power: 5748101
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
![]() Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,305
Rep Power: 10746
|
Also, much to the advantage of Wilt, there was no offensive goaltending either.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|