Reply

Old 11-27-2006, 06:55 PM   #61 (permalink)
Hakeem
The Wrath of God
 
Hakeem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,860
Credits: 12,632.66
Rep Power: 3206558 Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 1996 Bulls vs 1985 Lakers? Who wins and Why

^ Yup. The Bulls won so easily because Horace Grant was injured. He already had an arm injury, and it was aggravated when Pippen (I think) slammed into him in Game 1. So he played about half a game in the entire series. Nick Anderson was also injured, if I remember correctly. That was a really good side, but they had little depth. The loss of starters was a huge setback.

In the regular season, the Bulls of the second threepeat were 13-11 against 50+ win teams with good centers. It's not a good thing when Luc Longley is your best option for guarding Kareem Abdul-Jabbar.

Last edited by Hakeem : 11-27-2006 at 08:33 PM.
Hakeem is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 11-27-2006, 07:31 PM   #62 (permalink)
da bully
Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 167
Credits: 25.00
Rep Power: 60738 da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 1996 Bulls vs 1985 Lakers? Who wins and Why

Quote:
Originally Posted by JPSeraph
da bully: I should have been specific; REGULAR SEASON over achievers. Just the consumate pros, playing to win every night out. As opposed, say, to the Shaq/Kobe Lakers, who may have been just as dominant (relative to their competition from 00-02), but were quite manic in the regular season (largely taking on Shaq's personality IMO).

It's my way of saying that 72 wins, or great regular season off/def efficiciency, may be slightly over rating them next to any team which under achieved (as some would say the 85 Lakers did).

Another reason why I support those 92 Bulls even though their record was 67 wins and the roster doesn't have as many impressive names.
tell me jp what do you think about the 97 team i have stated that i believe this version is the greatest ever in basketball because they had 69 wins and did that with major injuries to key players. and didnt have brian williams the whole season. that team could have easily won 6 more games if they stayed relatively injury free. notice i said RELATIVELY not TOTALLY injury free.
da bully is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2006, 07:40 PM   #63 (permalink)
da bully
Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 167
Credits: 25.00
Rep Power: 60738 da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 1996 Bulls vs 1985 Lakers? Who wins and Why

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hakeem
^ Yup. The Bulls won so easily because Horace Grant was injured. He already had an arm injury, and it was aggravated when Pippen (I think) slammed into him in Game 1. So he played about half a game in the entire series. Nick Anderson was also injured, if I remember correctly. That was a really good side, but they had little depth. The loss of starters was a huge setback.

The Bulls of the second threepeat were 13-11 against 50+ win teams with good centers. It's not a good thing when Luc Longley is your best option for guarding Kareem Abdul-Jabbar.
this is another reason why the bulls were so great yes longley wasnt a great center but he was good for 2 things one of which he was better than kareem 1. he played great position defense and 2.he was an excellent jumpshooter. the latter being better than kareem. so yes kareem would give him fits but longly would make him pay offensively if he were to cheat and try to help out other defenders.
da bully is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2006, 07:57 PM   #64 (permalink)
Hakeem
The Wrath of God
 
Hakeem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,860
Credits: 12,632.66
Rep Power: 3206558 Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 1996 Bulls vs 1985 Lakers? Who wins and Why

^ He was a poor defender, IMO. And for his ability to hit the mid-range jump shot, he produced very little.
Hakeem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2006, 08:13 PM   #65 (permalink)
bballlife
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
 
bballlife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,094
Credits: 5,460.11
Rep Power: 1012935 bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 1996 Bulls vs 1985 Lakers? Who wins and Why

I said they held him in check, and they did, as in not allowing him to play the way he wanted. In that 4 game series, he had a decent game 1 (27 points 6 boards in a blowout) then one really good game (game 2) then an awful game 3 (17 points on 42%) and a decent game 4 (held to only 13 FGA)
__________________
NBA OFFICIATING, IT’S HORRIFIC!!!!!!!!!!!
bballlife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2006, 08:22 PM   #66 (permalink)
bballlife
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
 
bballlife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,094
Credits: 5,460.11
Rep Power: 1012935 bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 1996 Bulls vs 1985 Lakers? Who wins and Why

Quote:
Originally Posted by JPSeraph
regarding Jordan's weight:
1) From what I gather, he was 195 upon entry into the league (pre-draft or pre-1984-85 Bulls camp measurements I assume).
2) He was listed at 198 (might as well be 200) from sometime in the late 1980's until his retirement in 1993, but reportedly started lifting for strength and weight gain after one of his losses to the Pistons in the playoffs; maybe 1989 or 1990 (someone else probably remembers the exact year).
3) As of the 1991 Finals he was probably in the 205-210 range, but by 1992 he was closer to 215 (I've heard anything from 212-214).
4) I don't know what he weighed during his comeback in 94-95, but he came into training camp a very lean (something like 4% body fat) 216 in 95-96 after working out all summer.
5) He continued to be listed at 216 for the rest of his career (including the wizards comeback), but as bballlife said, he did look a little buffer by 97-98, so 220 doesn't seem improbable.
6) In 01-02, he was trying to play SF (with Rip at 2), and did come in weighing more than usual; I've heard anything from 225-235. (As an aside, Artest busted MJ's ribs in a summer pickup game which set MJ back a good 4-6 weeks in training, so he might have come in leaner otherwise as he was working off a retirement paunch)
7) For 02-03, he trimmed down - playing against larger, stronger SF's wasn't helping his knees and Stack was on board now - to 210 for preseason. It seems likely that he probably finished his career around 215 or so.

So, the poster who said MJ was 235 in the post...not even close. He was almost always in terrific shape (i.e. extremely low body fat%, similar to Karl Malone), but that typically meant maximizing the strength he would need to absorb contact and post up smaller guards with the quickness he needed to outmaneuver larger opponents. Playing with Pippen for so many years definitely helped MJ in finding this ideal ratio since Pip could take on many of the tougher/stronger opponents.

On with the actual debate!
Remember, though, Jordan was doing the breakfast club thing in Washington. (lifting on game days) Jordan was definitely a bit bigger in Washington and I swear I heard the Wizards putting him at 235. Remember, Kobe Bryant is 220-225 right now, and was 230 a few years ago. Wizard Jordan easily looked heavier than that. (same height, similar build)
__________________
NBA OFFICIATING, IT’S HORRIFIC!!!!!!!!!!!
bballlife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2006, 08:42 PM   #67 (permalink)
Hakeem
The Wrath of God
 
Hakeem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,860
Credits: 12,632.66
Rep Power: 3206558 Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute Hakeem has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 1996 Bulls vs 1985 Lakers? Who wins and Why

Quote:
Originally Posted by bballlife
I said they held him in check, and they did, as in not allowing him to play the way he wanted. In that 4 game series, he had a decent game 1 (27 points 6 boards in a blowout) then one really good game (game 2) then an awful game 3 (17 points on 42%) and a decent game 4 (held to only 13 FGA)
27 ppg on 64% from the field.
Hakeem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2006, 09:01 PM   #68 (permalink)
bballlife
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
 
bballlife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,094
Credits: 5,460.11
Rep Power: 1012935 bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute bballlife has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 1996 Bulls vs 1985 Lakers? Who wins and Why

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hakeem
27 ppg on 64% from the field.

Watch the 4 games, then read my post again.
__________________
NBA OFFICIATING, IT’S HORRIFIC!!!!!!!!!!!
bballlife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2006, 09:15 PM   #69 (permalink)
Pioneer10
The Stars or Bust!
 
Pioneer10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,042
Credits: 69,473.06
Rep Power: 3893812 Pioneer10 has a reputation beyond repute Pioneer10 has a reputation beyond repute Pioneer10 has a reputation beyond repute Pioneer10 has a reputation beyond repute Pioneer10 has a reputation beyond repute Pioneer10 has a reputation beyond repute Pioneer10 has a reputation beyond repute Pioneer10 has a reputation beyond repute Pioneer10 has a reputation beyond repute Pioneer10 has a reputation beyond repute Pioneer10 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 1996 Bulls vs 1985 Lakers? Who wins and Why

Quote:
Originally Posted by bballlife
Watch the 4 games, then read my post again.
I guarentee you that Hakeem watched those games. Again Orlando had two starters hurt and they had a terrible bench. The only other starter calibre player they had who wasn't hurt was Dennis Scott who was basically just a spot up shooter. Despite having no support other then Hardaway, Shaq still had 27 points on a ridiculously high TS%. There is basically no evidence to suggest that the Bulls were great at defending the center spot. Ewing was also able to score at his average with a higher percentage to boot and then against Seattle Kemp had a field day
__________________
My Blog
Discuss the Cavs and Lebron in the Cavs Forum
My Favorite 10 in order
Lebron • Wade • Ginobili • Deron Williams • A. Miller • "Boobie" Gibson • Roy • Dirk
• Hedo •Yao
Pioneer10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2006, 09:15 PM   #70 (permalink)
da bully
Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 167
Credits: 25.00
Rep Power: 60738 da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute da bully has a reputation beyond repute
Re: 1996 Bulls vs 1985 Lakers? Who wins and Why

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hakeem
^ He was a poor defender, IMO. And for his ability to hit the mid-range jump shot, he produced very little.
well, when you consider his role on the team IMO he was solid. he made shaq and other centers pay when they doubled on the scorers as that was his job. and he played good position defense, remember they really didnt run plays for him, he mostly played on the perimeter and rodman handled the boards. and he played against the greatest colection of centers ever every night. he averaged roughly about 10 points and 5 boards he was nifty around the basket. i think if he played in the 80s he would have been a 15 ppg scorer because of the pace.

which brings me to the point of pace and scoring. if the bulls played in the 80s their scorers would average at least 3 to 5 point per extra in that era.
90s 80s
jordan 30 ppg 33ppg
pippen 20ppg 25ppg
kukoc 13ppg 17ppg
longley 10ppg 14ppg

thats better than the lakers top four scorers.
da bully is offline   Reply With Quote