 |
|
07-05-2007, 02:35 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,452
|
Re: Darko Math
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GMJigga
Really? I'm sure I read that it's starting around 16.8 (what he would have gotten this year had he not opted out), and decreasing each year; ending up around 16.3 in his last year.
|
He's getting $61.8mm over 4 years. That averages $15.45mm per year.
Can't see how it would decrease from $16.8 down to $16.3 and not be over the reported $61.8mm total.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
07-05-2007, 02:57 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Newark.....California
Posts: 3,925
|
Re: Darko Math
According to this site:
http://nets247.com/salaries.html
VC was to pulled down 16.36 million on this years option. |
|
|
|
|
07-05-2007, 03:02 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Newark.....California
Posts: 3,925
|
Re: Darko Math
According to this article, VC's agent wanted the contract to average the 16 million he would have gotten if he exercised the option:
http://www.nj.com/sports/ledger/inde...920.xml&coll=1 |
|
|
|
|
07-05-2007, 03:40 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
|
Basketballboards Benchwarmer
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 127
|
Re: Darko Math
Doesn't the MLE not count towards your slary cap if used?
|
|
|
|
|
07-05-2007, 03:41 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,452
|
Re: Darko Math
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kidd Karma
|
Doesn't look like he got what he wanted. $61.8mm/4 = $15.45mm
Either that or the $61.8mm that has been reported is inaccurate.
|
|
|
|
|
07-05-2007, 04:17 PM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Newark.....California
Posts: 3,925
|
Re: Darko Math
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NJsavior
Doesn't the MLE not count towards your slary cap if used?
|
The MLE does not count against the cap until you sign a player using it.
|
|
|
|
|
07-05-2007, 09:25 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
|
The Voice of Reason
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,556
|
Re: Darko Math
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Netted
Doesn't look like he got what he wanted. $61.8mm/4 = $15.45mm
Either that or the $61.8mm that has been reported is inaccurate.
|
Well you can't just divide the contract between years since its prorated. He's getting a different amount each year.
|
|
|
|
|
07-06-2007, 09:40 AM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 53
|
Re: Darko Math
The $16M option doesn't matter in this case because he opted out of his contract; therefore he is signing a brand new contract.
Anyhow, I think it's worth the money, and we can still use the MLE regardless of VC's salary.
|
|
|
|
|
07-06-2007, 09:49 AM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,452
|
Re: Darko Math
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GMJigga
Well you can't just divide the contract between years since its prorated. He's getting a different amount each year.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kidd Karma
According to this article, VC's agent wanted the contract to average the 16 million he would have gotten if he exercised the option:
|
Yes, you can divide the contract by the number of years if you are looking for the average.
|
|
|
|
|
07-06-2007, 12:10 PM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Jungleland
Posts: 13,166
|
Re: Darko Math
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Netted
Yes, you can divide the contract by the number of years if you are looking for the average.
|
16.8, 15.5, 15, 14.5
$500,000 raise next season, from the $16.3 he was going to get, then declining salaries the remaining three years.
__________________
NetsDaily...now available in Chinese
|
|
|
|
|
07-06-2007, 12:39 PM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 8,452
|
Re: Darko Math
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NetIncome
16.8, 15.5, 15, 14.5
$500,000 raise next season, from the $16.3 he was going to get, then declining salaries the remaining three years.
|
I understand a declining salary. Still doesn't equal an average salary equal to the $16.3 million he would have gotten if he exercised the option that his agent supposedly wanted, which was the purpose of my post.
|
|
|
|
|
07-06-2007, 02:29 PM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Newark.....California
Posts: 3,925
|
Re: Darko Math
...his agent wanted the option to average the salary, Thorn wanted something close to 15 million per.....they compromised, well we'll see the official terms what....next Wednesday. No sense beating a dead horse for 5 days.
|
|
|
|
|
07-07-2007, 08:52 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
|
|
Re: Darko Math
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Net2
why would we get rid of BRob? He's gonna be a starter some day. And because of this, I also entrust him with the nickname "Deathblow".
|
he could be next season's boki.
|
|
|
|
|
07-07-2007, 08:56 PM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
|
Spread the Love
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: yup
Posts: 2,717
|
Re: Darko Math
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by peg182
he could be next season's boki.
|
Damn straight. If you look at his career averages, if he got 30 mpg, he could average 9/5/2 with 1.5 spg and good defense at the 2.
|
|
|
|
07-09-2007, 08:52 AM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 98
|
Re: Darko Math
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NetIncome
16.8, 15.5, 15, 14.5
$500,000 raise next season, from the $16.3 he was going to get, then declining salaries the remaining three years.
|
NI: Where did you get these numbers from? When I first heard about the contract, I immediately went to figure out what the cap load for this year would be under the usual, 10% increase structure. I came away with this:
13.32 - 14.65 - 16.11 - 17.72. If that's the case, then Dave D's total salary commitments number for next year looks about right. . . and (if your cap estimate is on target) we still have over 4MM to spend under the threshold.
|
|
|
|
|
Darko Math
