View Poll Results: What Do You Think?
|
|
Marbury/Crawford/Richardson/Ratliff or Curry/Curry or Ratliff
|
 
|
4 |
57.14% |
|
Marbury/Crawford/Richardson/Curry/James
|
 
|
3 |
42.86% |
|
Marbury/Crawford/Richardson/Rose/Curry
|
 
|
0 |
0% |
| Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll |
 |
10-14-2005, 06:00 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards 6th Man
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 254
|
What Lineup Is Better?
I think the best lineup is....
PG-Marbury
SG-Crawford
SF-Richardson
PF-Ratliff
C-Curry
IDK if Curry would be playin PF or not because i know that Theo is one, if not the best, shot blocker in the league and can block anyone in the league but could be playin PF because Curry is an inch taller than Ratliff. But this is if Ratliff is even traded to the Knicks. If he isn't than i would say the best lineup is.....
PG-Marbury
SG-Crawford
SF-Richardson
PF-Curry
C-James
What Do You Think?
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
10-14-2005, 08:25 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
User titles suck.
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,389
|
Re: What Lineup Is Better?
u got ratliff, i thought it was a rumor or something that hasnt happen yet.
|
|
|
10-14-2005, 09:21 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards 6th Man
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 254
|
Re: What Lineup Is Better?
if u can read look at my 1st post
|
|
|
10-15-2005, 12:53 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Broken Memories
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ramapo College
Age: 23
Posts: 1,252
|
Re: What Lineup Is Better?
PG-Marbury
SG-Crawford
SF-Richardson
PF-Ratliff
C-Curry
Is with out a doubt the best line up, however
PG-Marbury
SG-Crawford
SF-Richardson
PF-Curry
C-James
Is not that much of a difference, also considering what the Kincks will have to give up in order to obtain Ratliff, or the burden of taking his contract.
__________________
New Jersey Nets
Thanks for an awesome season, BRING IT(next season)!
Gaspar Noé for Sadist of the Year!
If you have any intrest in business or knowing what really goes on in the business world, read this
Book
Quote of The Month
"Hell is overflowing, and Satan is sending the damned to us. Why? God is punishing us. You have sex out of wedlock. You have man on man relations, same sex marriages. How do you think your God will judge you? Well, friends, now we know. When there is no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth."
|
|
|
10-17-2005, 04:49 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
6th Man
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hustle Bridge--HB
Posts: 390
|
Re: What Lineup Is Better?
Ratliff is a waste. With 4-pts and 5-rpg. He has broken down as a player. If we have to give up Nate and Lee. Then we are surely getting ripped off. We should trade those guys knowing that they are a future.
__________________
Dynamiks
aka
Young Fresh to def
aka
DRC
Only God Can Judge Me
WWJD
ON THE RADAR: Shaun Livingston, Rudy Gay, Kyle Lowry, Jamal Crawford, Dwight Howard, Randy Foye, Danny Granger, Charlie Villanueva, Kirk Hinrich, Kevin Martin, Brandon Roy and Jameer Nelson
Renaldo Balkman is a man on a mission. To prove the doubters wrong.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by krsticfan325
The Nets got Hassan Adams at 54 and the Pistons got Will Blalock at 60, both are better players than Ronaldo Balkman could ever dream to me.
|
F the nets. Knicks are on a mission.
|
|
|
10-17-2005, 05:27 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Basketballboards Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 173
|
Re: What Lineup Is Better?
I wouldn't get too caught up in judging a "lineup" of 5 players---that's not really how the game is played. Good teams usually develop rotations of 8/9, sometimes 10 players----the key is to find good 5 man combinations that offer some flexibility depending on matchups and situations.
I am hopeful that our young players will find some time withing that rotation. I believe that Ariza, Lee and Frye should get meaningful minutes immediately---some of those minutes will be wasted on youth, but they can improve quickly and determine the direction of this team.
|
|
|
10-17-2005, 05:51 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
X-Mas Taker
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: nyc
Posts: 7,109
|
Re: What Lineup Is Better?
i think this line up is best.
c-curry
pf-AD
sf-ariza
sg-marbury
pg-JC
__________________
"The country is full of good coaches. What it takes to win is a bunch of interested players."-Don Coryell, ex-San Diego Chargers Coach
|
|
|
10-17-2005, 07:32 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards 6th Man
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 254
|
Re: What Lineup Is Better?
davis wont play for the knicks hes gonna be a bench warmer cuz he will not put any effort for when he plays, AD for Theo?, probably if davis doesnt start playin or showin up to practice.
|
|
|
 |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|