 |
|
11-19-2005, 09:56 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
The Corrupted
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 58,030
|
Watson for James or Rose?
Quote:
"Earl Watson could solve the Knicks' point guard problems. He is on the Nuggets' depth chart behind Andre Miller and Earl Boykins, and Denver is looking for a forward with Nene sidelined. The Knicks could move either Malik Rose or Jerome James for Watson, who scored four points in just over 17 minutes of action."
-New York Daily News
|
Don't even think the numbers are close though.
-Petey
__________________
Owner of the KVBL, Orlando Magic; Presenting: Chris Paul, PG, 05~06 ROY!
Owner of the Nets' Forum GM Draft (II), Orlando Magic. Home of: DHo, Darko, Iggy and Jameer Nelson!
Owner of the BBBBL, Cleveland Indians; Featuring: David Ortiz: 2006 & 2009 AL MVP!
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
11-19-2005, 11:44 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
X-Mas Taker
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: nyc
Posts: 7,108
|
Re: Watson for James or Rose?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Petey
Don't even think the numbers are close though.
-Petey
|
actually they are, 5 mil. for each watson and james , 6 mil. for rose. both fit under trade rules easily $wise.
__________________
"The country is full of good coaches. What it takes to win is a bunch of interested players."-Don Coryell, ex-San Diego Chargers Coach
|
|
|
11-19-2005, 11:49 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
The Corrupted
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 58,030
|
Re: Watson for James or Rose?
Wow, I'm shocked that Watson is making that much.
-Petey
__________________
Owner of the KVBL, Orlando Magic; Presenting: Chris Paul, PG, 05~06 ROY!
Owner of the Nets' Forum GM Draft (II), Orlando Magic. Home of: DHo, Darko, Iggy and Jameer Nelson!
Owner of the BBBBL, Cleveland Indians; Featuring: David Ortiz: 2006 & 2009 AL MVP!
|
|
|
11-19-2005, 12:23 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
All-Star
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: I love the bulls!!!
Posts: 5,529
|
Re: Watson for James or Rose?
 if ny thinks they could trade rose or james...we dont want your crap.
|
|
|
11-19-2005, 12:25 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Sexy Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 11,432
|
Re: Watson for James or Rose?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NugzFan
 if ny thinks they could trade rose or james...we dont want your crap.
|
And you actually think you have a PF or Center at this point that can relieve Camby? You not going to get far with a injury riddle K-Mart and a out for the season Nene.
__________________
Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege.
PLEASE BEWARE THIS POSTER MAY GO ON THE DEEP END AT ANY GIVEN TIME. Use Caution!
|
|
|
11-19-2005, 01:02 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
All-Star
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,175
|
Re: Watson for James or Rose?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kitty
And you actually think you have a PF or Center at this point that can relieve Camby? You not going to get far with a injury riddle K-Mart and a out for the season Nene.
|
I wouldnt give up james for earl Watson so fast...Ild rather go find Frank Williams or see how Jay Williams is healing
|
|
|
11-19-2005, 09:15 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 2,426
|
Re: Watson for James or Rose?
Quote:
|
I wouldnt give up james for earl Watson so fast...Ild rather go find Frank Williams or see how Jay Williams is healing
|
Why? Are you scared to death of PGs who can play defense, can actually run an offense, and don't think shoot first? This comment certainly makes it seem that way.
Or would you be upset because Watson would make Nate Robinson the offical 12th man since he'd actually put up a good A/T ratio to go with the poor shooting percentage?
|
|
|
11-19-2005, 09:32 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 15
|
Re: Watson for James or Rose?
James for watson is a no brainer. The james signing was the worst move under the isiah era. If the knicks can do it, they should. Theres no point in having james sit out for 5 years and having no value. Same thing for denver, no need for watson to be sitting out.
|
|
|
11-19-2005, 09:44 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 2,426
|
Re: Watson for James or Rose?
I for one would like to see James collapse while running up and down the court at Denver altitude.
|
|
|
11-20-2005, 05:06 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 981
|
Watson is not a pure point....
Anyone that thinks he is is deluding themselves....LB has said as much. He is more of a scoring guard pg and we have one already. Marbury will make a crappy 2 guard besides.....he has no idea of game flow and will always be prone take badly timed shots when control is what is needed..no judgement.
|
|
|
11-20-2005, 05:18 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
All-Star
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,175
|
Re: Watson is not a pure point....
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by alphadog
Anyone that thinks he is is deluding themselves....LB has said as much. He is more of a scoring guard pg and we have one already. Marbury will make a crappy 2 guard besides.....he has no idea of game flow and will always be prone take badly timed shots when control is what is needed..no judgement.
|
thank you Alfa...a little sanity is always welcomed....
|
|
|
11-20-2005, 05:21 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
All-Star
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,175
|
Re: Watson for James or Rose?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rashidi
I for one would like to see James collapse while running up and down the court at Denver altitude.
|
I think a simple trade would be a kinder wish
|
|
|
11-20-2005, 08:52 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
BasketballBoards Player
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 981
|
Article in the Post...
said we are looking for a PG but don't have the resources to trade. Also said that Curry is the ONLY untouchable. I hate the sound of that...Lee and Frye are future stars, in their own way, although for Lee it may be as a role player. Anyone else I am OK with although I like Nate and think he may turn out to be a good one, even if he is another bench player. Too much heart and hustle to trade. If we have to take our lumps this year, so be it. I'll wait for the season end and another good draft/trade.
|
|
|
11-20-2005, 02:37 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
All-Star
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,175
|
Re: Article in the Post...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by alphadog
said we are looking for a PG but don't have the resources to trade. Also said that Curry is the ONLY untouchable. I hate the sound of that...Lee and Frye are future stars, in their own way, although for Lee it may be as a role player. Anyone else I am OK with although I like Nate and think he may turn out to be a good one, even if he is another bench player. Too much heart and hustle to trade. If we have to take our lumps this year, so be it. I'll wait for the season end and another good draft/trade.
|
If Frye isnt untouchable or dam close(KG trade),then Zeke or Brown should have their collective heads examined..The guy is far better than I ever imagined,and I was high on him from the start.Other than Sheed,Dirk or TD,I cant think of many 6'11 players with his stroke...And the soft label is ridiculous
|
|
|
11-20-2005, 08:53 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 2,426
| |